Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : The Residential Real Estate Crash Index -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: MulhollandDrive who wrote (162451)	11/6/2008 2:54:38 PM
From: Smiling Bob	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 306849

The drink tax would fit into that category

To: MulhollandDrive who wrote (162451)	11/6/2008 2:57:51 PM
From: bentway	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 306849

"maybe he should call for an additional surtax on luxury goods, an across the board sales tax increase is HIGHLY regressive....stick it to the wealthy instead..." Wow! Maybe you AREN'T a neanderthal! I agree, CA has tons of really rich people who could pay more. A guy in my tennis club asserted to me that it was impossible to live in S. Cal. unless you made at least $100k/yr, minimum. I told him the median FAMILY income in San Diego county at the time was like $32k/yr, and he refused to believe me.