SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: combjelly who wrote (433462)11/6/2008 4:16:27 PM
From: one_less1 Recommendation  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1572108
 
"Given the number of smears that get posted here on an hourly basis, why did you center on this one in particular?"

Again my reasons for centering on this one is irrelevant. However, whether you realize it or not, you are recognizing that it is smearing not merely passing on news from articles.

Me: "I have stated clearly ... "

You: "I haven't seen any such posts."

Which qualifies you to make things up about my posting?? I don't think so. We call that lieing where I come from. I am a frequent poster on more than one thread. I'm pretty sure you know that.

"You popped up here a couple of days ago to defend Palin."

It was my intention to post kind words on her behalf. Is that what you are referring too? You seem to have made that connection you were looking for between why I would center on this one. I don't know why you are acting confused about it but you have your reasons I suppose.

"And now you are issuing threats."

Threats? Could you provide the links or at least a list of these threats. I don't remember having done that. I think you must be mistaken again, or you are lying.

"Here, though, is the reality. Slander against public officials is very difficult to prosecute. In Ted's case, he is just repeating something that was broadcast on Fox. There is nothing that is illegal about that, despite your claims. "

That reads like a challenge and you must know there is only one way to settle that kind of challenge. Odd that you would want to do that.

"So far, you are coming off as the type that uses false information and intimidation to try to shut people up."

I haven't posted any false information that I am aware of. You must be mistaken or you are lying. Please provide a link to the false information you are referring to. If you are unable to do that I will await your apology. Lacking either we can conclude, it was just a lie.

"You aren't the first like that to post here."

I have no idea what you are talking about.