SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : The Obama - Clinton Disaster -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: pompsander who wrote (517)11/7/2008 4:23:58 PM
From: DuckTapeSunroof  Respond to of 103300
 
Re: "Buddy, I think (in perfect hindsight) that a selection of Tom Ridge would have probably gotten McCain Pennsylvania and maybe Ohio."

Pomp, we've danced around this one before. <ggg>

I'll bet that McCain's folks looked at Ridge (& Pawlenty & at the ex-Bush foreign trade negotiator from OH... what was his name?) all pretty closely.

Those three (&, IMO, ole Huckleberry :-) most likely should'a been on the list of finalists for the V.P. selection.

(ALL of those four, and I'll add Palin to that to make five, I believe would have run stronger electorally than, say Romney would have.)

But, from an electoral point-of-view, none of them came without some 'fleas'....

Ridge, for example, would have sent the 'Holy Roller Crowd' literally over the edge. (So, again, IMO... what he added in PA he might have cost in Party enthusiasm and contributions elsewhere... possibly even costing GA as well as FL, perhaps others.)

Pawlenty might have been perceived as 'safe', and would have brought some youth to the ticket... but has been regarded as a bit of a 'snooze' on the stump (& almost as unknown on the national level as Palin was before her selection).

If I had been making the decision for McCain camp, I would have thought that ole Huck, also a Governor as was Ridge, gave the best combination of pluses and minuses (but possibly McCain did not want to seem to be 'anointing' someone who would so obviously grow into the GOP candidate for 2012 --- and thereby from day one begin to overshadow the one term McCain.

Ironically though, even while likely wanting to avoid that fate, it seems that that might have happened with Palin anyway. :-)

(I'm guessing that was something that McCain never really expected when he decided to 'roll the dice' with a gamble on Palin....)



To: pompsander who wrote (517)11/7/2008 10:20:50 PM
From: Sedohr Nod2 Recommendations  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 103300
 
69% of GOP Voters Say Palin Helped McCain
Friday,

November 07, 2008 Email to a FriendAdvertisement

Sixty-nine percent (69%) of Republican voters say Alaska Governor Sarah Palin helped John McCain’s bid for the presidency, even as news reports surface that some McCain staffers think she was a liability.

Only 20% of GOP voters say Palin hurt the party’s ticket, according to a new Rasmussen Reports national telephone survey. Six percent (6%) say she had no impact, and five percent (5%) are undecided.

Ninety-one percent (91%) of Republicans have a favorable view of Palin, including 65% who say their view is Very Favorable. Only eight percent (8%) have an unfavorable view of her, including three percent (3%) Very Unfavorable.

rasmussenreports.com