Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : View from the Center and Left -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Lane3 who wrote (94746)	11/8/2008 8:38:47 AM
From: Lane3	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 541414

Tim posted this on the National Health Care thread. I thought it worthy of wider dissemination. It hasn't been that long since Medicare disallowed private arrangements for additional payments from patients to doctors. Looks like the NHS is putting a fork in the "we all suffer together" approach. Sense at last Written by Tom Clougherty Wednesday, 05 November 2008 As expected, the government yesterday decided to allow 'private top-ups' within the NHS. In other words, patients are now going to be allowed to pay privately for additional drugs and treatments, without losing their right to NHS care and having to foot the bill for all of their treatment. Previously, the government had always put the NHS' soviet-era ideology ahead of the health of patients, arguing that, "co-payments would risk creating a two-tier health service and be in direct contravention with the principles and values of the NHS". In previous blogs, I have described that policy as immoral, irrational, and quite possibly illegal, so I'm glad the government has finally seen sense. I'm still not sure why they needed an official review to tell them it was wrong to actively prevent people from accessing life-saving drugs and treatments, but there you go. The real shame is that Andrew Lansley, the Tory health spokesman, doesn't seem to see it that way, telling the media, "I find it astonishing frankly, that we seem, the government seems, to be drifting into a system where we’ll end up with a two tier national health service." The Tories' general lack of radicalism on health reform is probably sensible – politically speaking – but standing in the way of genuine progress to score a partisan point is just wrong. For the party of individual choice to speak out against letting people spend their own money on their own health is perverse. And make no mistake: allowing top-ups is a very definite step in the right direction as far as healthcare reform goes. Firstly, it lets people pay out-of-pocket for things that are too expensive to be provided by the taxpayer – good. Secondly, it will encourage the growth of affordable top-up insurance plans, giving many more people access to those new and expensive drugs. But there's a more important aspect to this decision: it ends the long-running fiction that the state (or rather, the taxpayer) can ever provide everything. The lasting impact of this decision will hopefully be that the NHS becomes a defined benefit, rather than an open-ended entitlement. adamsmith.org

To: Lane3 who wrote (94746)	11/9/2008 5:52:53 AM
From: Cogito	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 541414

>>Once one perceives the question as one of equal treatment under the law, the answer is undeniable.<< Karen - Exactly. I've given the matter a lot of thought, and that's where I find the train always takes me. By the way, there were very large marches going on in Hollywood this evening, going right down Sunset Boulevard. I saw them first hand. If I hadn't been otherwise engaged for the evening, I might have joined them. This issue is catching fire around here. - Allen