Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks : Rocky Mountain Int'l (OTC:RMIL former OTC:OVIS) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: sandshark who wrote (7352)	10/22/1997 1:04:00 PM
From: Jack of All Trades	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 55532

Sandshark, Are you the one that took the pictures of the supposed empty garment facility?? I see you live in Florida. :>)) IMO JeffG

To: sandshark who wrote (7352)	10/22/1997 1:07:00 PM
From: FTJoe	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 55532

I think you embarrased yourself with the following statement. You only covered the possibility of shorting a stock and then when it goes down. The point you were responding to was a guess that someone shorted BELOW the current price and had to come up with money to cover. You do understand that if you cover and the stock is above what you shorted it at, you must come up with money somehow? Don't you? <When you sell a stock short you create a credit in an account. You don't have to sell anything else to be able to buy it back. That is the principle behind selling short in the first place. You hope that the stock goes down and will cost less to buy back than the amount credited by the short sale.>

To: sandshark who wrote (7352)	10/22/1997 1:10:00 PM
From: FTJoe	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 55532

What you didn't understand was the response to the statement you made: <To get them to go golfing with investment bankers.> That was in reponse to the question why do analysts care about what CFOs and CEOs have to say. Your market savvy is frightening!! ;-)

To: sandshark who wrote (7352)	10/22/1997 1:17:00 PM
From: MZUBOZ	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 55532

Doo-shay. Actually, I don't understand what you mean. I'm bored so if you want to argue about market principles I would be very interested in embarrassing you. Other than the remark about the forehead, I was referring to the non-answer that you gave to my question. It is quite possible that you may very well know more about market principles than I do. Why would you get pleasure out of embarrassing someone, though? As far as the Doo-shay greeteng of yours, if you mean what I think you do, believe me I have heard much worse.