SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Nadine Carroll who wrote (280136)11/12/2008 1:57:48 AM
From: Ruffian  Respond to of 793964
 
Secular candidate apparant winner in Jerusalem


By MARK LAVIE, Associated Press Writer Mark Lavie, Associated Press Writer – 1 hr 1 min ago
An Ultra-Orthodox Jewish man votes in the Jerusalem mayoral elections in a AP – An Ultra-Orthodox Jewish man votes in the Jerusalem mayoral elections in a school in Jerusalem, Tuesday, …

JERUSALEM – Secular businessman Nir Barkat appeared headed toward victory early Wednesday over an ultra-Orthodox Jewish leader in Jerusalem's mayoral race, a contest that again exposed the deep divide between religious and secular Israelis.

With nearly all of the results in, Israel's Channel 2 TV reported that just over 52 percent of the city's voters had supported Barkat over Meir Porush. That tally was matched by the country's two other main television stations and the Web sites of all three major newspapers.

Barkat claimed victory before dawn and promised to be "everybody's mayor."

"I'm aware of the depth of the challenge and the complexity of the mission. Now is the time to work together for the good of the city," Barkat, a technology investor and former paratroops officer, told his supporters.

Porush received just over 43 percent of the vote, according to Channel 2 and the Web site of Israel's largest newspaper, Yediot Ahronot.

Israelis voted around the country, picking mayors and city councils, but local issues and strong independent candidates overshadowed clashes between the major parties three months before national elections. In Jerusalem, the three largest parties failed to field candidates for mayor for the first time, leaving the race to representatives of two of the city's three distinctive and often squabbling groupings.

Barkat is a venture capitalist in his second try for the mayor's job. Porush, 53, has been an imposing figure on the ultra-Orthodox national political scene for years.

In the only reported incident of violence in Jerusalem, police broke up a demonstration by extremist ultra-Orthodox Jews who do not recognize Israel. Police said they were trying to prevent people from voting.

The appearances of the two rivals in Jerusalem underlined their differences. Porush wears a long, black coat and black skullcap, as do the tens of thousands of ultra-Orthodox Jews. The bareheaded, casually dressed Barkat reflects the embattled, dwindling secular Jewish residents of Jerusalem.

With a high birth rate and government financial support, ultra-Orthodox Jews are a growing proportion of Jerusalem's population, while many secular Jews are leaving the city because of their lack of control and rising municipal tax rates.

Uri Lupoliansky rode that trend in his victory in 2003, becoming the first ultra-Orthodox Jew to serve as Jerusalem's mayor, succeeding Ehud Olmert, now Israel's outgoing premier.

Left out is the third sector — Jerusalem's Palestinian residents. They make up a third of the city's population of 750,000 and have the right to vote after Israel annexed their section of the city in 1967. But most boycott instead of tacitly recognizing Israeli control by taking part in city elections. Palestinians claim their section of Jerusalem as the capital of the state they hope to create.

The mayor of Jerusalem has no official standing in Israeli-Palestinian negotiations, but one area of agreement between Porush and Barkat — and the other two candidates who are seen as having little chance of victory — is opposition to division of Jerusalem as part of a peace deal.

Instead, the two leading candidates favor building thousands more apartments for Israelis in the disputed part of the city, angering Palestinians.

More mundane issues face the incoming mayor. Financially strapped because a large proportion of its residents are poor, downtown Jerusalem has become shabby and dirty. In the past year it has also become a construction zone, with the building of a light rail tying up traffic and angering residents and merchants.

Barkat, 49, was emphasizing economic issues, aiming to persuade younger Israelis to stay in the city. Porush labeled his campaign "Jerusalem for everyone," but his focus was on services for the city's Orthodox and ultra-Orthodox Jews.

Adina Freimark, 20, a religious resident of Jerusalem, said she voted for Porush.

"I felt like I wanted someone who would care about Jerusalem as a city for the Jewish people," Freimark said. "There's a lot of talk about giving Jerusalem away and I want Jerusalem to stay in Jewish hands."

Pre-elections polls gave Barkat with a slight lead, but ultra-Orthodox residents traditionally vote in much higher percentages than others, possibly giving Porush an edge.

In Tel Aviv, two-term incumbent Ron Huldai was trying to fend off Dov Khenin, 50, a member of Israel's parliament from the Communist party Hadash. While Khenin is Jewish, his party is especially popular with Arab voters because of its calls for Palestinian and Arab rights.

But Khenin's strong environmental stand rather than his views on Arab-Jewish relations have won him popularity in Tel Aviv, Israel's commercial and cultural center, home to 390,000 people.

Huldai, 64, is a former general, fighter pilot and high school principal with a pro-business bent.

Early returns gave Huldai a solid lead.

news.yahoo.com



To: Nadine Carroll who wrote (280136)11/12/2008 8:48:37 AM
From: goldworldnet13 Recommendations  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 793964
 
Some of my main concerns are the following:

1) The erosion of the First Amendment and a press that is either afraid of Obama or believes he is above scrutiny. There are already dangerous signs of this. Obama has appeared to own the press and many comedians and humorists have already acknowledged that Obama will be off limits.

2) The erosion of the Second Amendment based on comments made by Obama in the past. The worst possible scenario would be firearm confiscation similar to what was done in Australia.

3) Obama's plans for a civilian service corp as powerful as the military that could open up terrifying prospects that have occurred previously in world history.

4) Transforming the IRS into a welfare distribution system. Currently 38% of Americans are on the government dole. Projections of an Obama system raise that number to about 48%. Voters whose only goal is to increase entitlements will create government dependence as has never been seen before in this country.

5) Obama's plans for reduced oil and coal production in the US with cap and trade regulations that have a crushing impact on industry and the economy.

* * *