SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Pastimes : Heart Attacks, Cancer and strokes. Preventative approaches -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Justin C who wrote (1993)11/14/2008 2:31:35 AM
From: LindyBill  Respond to of 39355
 
I've wondered if having the belly fat liposuctioned away reduces the death risk.

I see no reason why not. The main thing is, "it's gone!" My personal experience right now confirms Davis's hypothisis that getting off wheat really effects the belly fat. I am losing it faster than I thought I would.

Two years ago I was a 72-year-old overweight, hypertensive male who used to drink and smoke. I had no symptoms, but felt I was a perfect profile for heart and cancer problems. So I got a body and heart scan. And turned up a kidney cancer and heart disease.

Sure am glad I checked!



To: Justin C who wrote (1993)11/14/2008 10:02:16 AM
From: Joe NYC  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 39355
 
Justin,

I think when they say belly fat, they mean visceral fat, inside the abdominal cavity, not the under the skin (subcutaneous) fat.

I don't know much about liposuction, but I am under the impression that they don't do visceral fat.

My other comment on this would be that yes, visceral fat itself is not just dead weight, it is an active organ, making things worse, but that is not the only problem. The problem is a lifestyle that leads to visceral fat accumulation.

As far as which component (accumulated fat or lifestyle that leads to fat accumulation) is responsible for what percentage of the effect LB linked (Doubling of death rate) - I have no idea.

Joe