Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: goldworldnet who wrote (280631)	11/15/2008 10:52:50 PM
From: ManyMoose	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 794349

Legal expertise to write laws could be acquired by contract, could it not? I think having the legal profession ensconced in Congress creates a real problem. Once I had to prepare a contract for an Environmental Impact Statement. I had a lot of contracting experience in tree planting and stand improvement service contracts, but none in the NEPA field. NEPA was created by congress, and presumably by lawyers. Since I had no legal expertise, I contracted with a contractor to help write the contract to procure the EIS. The contractor was barred from bidding on the EIS contract that he helped write, but the contract was held up as a model of clarity, and resulted in a lot of bids. I see no reason why something like this could not be done in Congress. In other words, in my view it is preferable to have non-attorneys come up with the principles and the general concept they want to legislate and hire attorneys to dot eyes and cross the tees, so to speak.