Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Non-Tech : Alternative energy -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Eric who wrote (5560)	11/15/2008 11:52:47 PM
From: Cogito Ergo Sum	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 16955

Thanks, When you mentioned.. Try to keep tip speed below speed of sound.. I have the impression the goal is far lower actually and that you were suggesting that as a regular limitation.. ..One of the first turbines in Canada is at Pickering Nuclear plant which I can see from my home when I walk the dogs down by the lake (or go to the mall :0) One of the most asked questions from the public in the early days (it's been many years now I guess) was Why is it always off when it is windy Of course anyone that has flown a kite knows that answer :O) The Black Swan

To: Eric who wrote (5560)	11/16/2008 3:44:04 PM
From: Doren	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 16955

It seems to me that there might be a lot more potential for a break through design in this area. (Unlike the solar panel area.) The vertical egg beater design was an interesting attempt. I've skimmed through a couple of books on the subject. It's quite interesting the pros and cons of each design. My guess is someone will figure it out, just as we figured out how to exceed the speed of sound. especially the gearbox and generator! One would think that geared transmission would help here. I'm thinking that if bicycles can shift automatically then why not windmills? The torque forces have to be unreal on some of those biggies, not to mention harmonic feedback loops.