SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : The Residential Real Estate Crash Index -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Riskmgmt who wrote (164757)11/16/2008 8:24:50 AM
From: orkriousRead Replies (2) | Respond to of 306849
 
I can not believe in the 34 subsequent posts no one mentions it. It is jaw dropping even to readers of this thread...It is hard for me to comprehend the magnitude of corruption she claims exists. Has her work been commented on here before?


I just started reading her comments on the Solari web site. It's incredible stuff. It's so overwhelming I decided to take a break. I'll get back to it after breakfast.

She does incredible work. There are a few people here (is it gregor or bart? I can't remember.) who have talked about her a lot.



To: Riskmgmt who wrote (164757)11/16/2008 9:43:19 AM
From: patron_anejo_por_favorRead Replies (1) | Respond to of 306849
 
A lot of her work has been commented on (contemporaneously). And there's no doubt there's been tremendous amounts of fraud during the housing bubble, under the "wink and nod" lack of enforcement by governmental agencies (particularly state enforcement agencies in bubble areas and also the FBI). As usual, the crooks only get caught after the bubble implodes, same as with the internet bubble. Not much of a deterrent when it happens in that sequence.



To: Riskmgmt who wrote (164757)11/16/2008 12:54:37 PM
From: Sr KRead Replies (1) | Respond to of 306849
 
Her interview was in ~Feb 2005.



To: Riskmgmt who wrote (164757)11/16/2008 3:08:53 PM
From: JillRead Replies (1) | Respond to of 306849
 
It's hard to know how much of what she says is actually reportable and can be backed up. I'm sure much of the gist is true but there is a kind of rambling overstated quality to it that makes me wonder if she has her own axes to grind. Esp. as a journalist I find it unlikely that staff journalists would be working on stories with the approval of their editors that were at the last minute killed etc. It's possible of course.


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News