Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Tenchusatsu who wrote (435318)	11/17/2008 3:47:32 PM
From: tejek	Respond to of 1573691

Ted, > Sometimes violence is the only way to make change. However, it should be the method of last resort and only used in extreme situations like where people are dying wholesale. The logic has been twisted so much by violent activists that it's hard to tell the difference. People who advocate bombing abortion clinics, for instance, think they're saving the lives of the unborn. People who advocate vandalizing Hummer dealerships or bombing coal power plants think they're helping to prevent global warming, which they see as a threat to humanity's very existence. There is no limit to the amount of violence that can be justified based on what you feel is an "extreme situation." Good points.......that's why I think it should be used as an option of last resort.