To: James J. Cramer who wrote (18693 ) 10/22/1997 4:48:00 PM From: sepku Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 61433
>>>Wrong! You specifically accused me of violating a written pledge I have made to the Securities and Exchange Commission<<< What?! When did I say that? Since you have specifics, I would appreciate you pointing out where/when I accused you of violating anything. The point I was making is that I don't recall anyone accusing you of anything criminal...but that doesn't mean they have to like you. Personally, I enjoy hearing you publicly slam the institutional/analyst manipulating BS that permeates Wall Street these days. In fact, you seem not to give a damn about political-correctness and whether people like what you have to say, which is refreshing considering the spineless status quo of Wall Street. >>>Securities and Exchange Commissions Investment Adviser Act of 1940. I am a lawyer, but so what.<<< Oh man...I'm arguing with a lawyer. I can just tell this is going to go nowhere fast! >>>The definition of libel is pretty simple: accusing someone of a criminal act without any basis in the truth (reckless disregard).<<< Taking into consideration the definition you provided, it appears that YOU may now be guilty of libel, since you are accusing me of libeling you, when I did no such thing. >>>Grow up. Sticks and stones may break my bones, which is why I carry a bazooka.<<< Grow up? Who threatened someone on this board in the first place? That is hardly mature in itself. At least I have more room to work with since I am younger than you, yes? As for a bazooka...you mean the bubble gum, right? Let me change the subject a little here. Pulling up your profile, I see you have been a member at SI for almost 2 months or so. And your first 2 posts are to argue over libel issues! How about joining our discussions regarding ASND...or would that be violating the SEC rule? Style Pts.