SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Obama Watch -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Crimson Ghost who wrote (55)11/18/2008 5:08:45 PM
From: LTK007  Respond to of 290
 
i seems to be a manifest drive to get rid of the pretense of two parties, and now bring it out in the open The One Party the War Party ruled and owned by Ultra Zionist.

This is a rather major step towards a bringing into being a Totalitarian Government that is what i will plainly state should be called The U.S.Likud Party.

Obama i manifestly revealing he compltelt BONDED NeoCon/NeoLib as ruled by the most RABID Zionist Likudnics.

i dedicate this post to Hannah Arendt/Primo Levi/Yeshayahu Leibowitz/Gilad Atzmon/ Phillip Weiss/ Glenn Greenwald/ Michael Leigh and jews of conscience that live in outrage at what Israel has become.
i close this post with something i oft doe the past, i will then attach it is to the header of this thread.

This item that follows speaks of Jews the saw the Danger of Zionism

This that follows the warning of but a few of the jews that saw the dangers of Zionism.

<<For well over a century, Jewish intellectuals—and especially those German-Jewish academics who constituted the mainstream of Jewish philosophy in the last century—have had serious doubts concerning the legitimacy and desirability of harnessing the interests of the Jewish people to the worldly power of a political state. Only the Holocaust, the most extreme demonstration of the evil of Jewish powerlessness imaginable, succeeded in turning the objections of the intellectuals to the Jewish state into an embarrassment, for the most part driving their opposition underground. Yet Jewish intellectuals, even in Israel, never became fully reconciled to the empowerment of the Jewish people entailed in the creation of a Jewish state. For example, Martin BUBER, then living in Jerusalem, argued in 1958 that the belief in the efficacy of power embraced by so many Jews in his generation had been learned from Hitler. And with time, this manner of discussing the Jewish national power—which had been a staple of Jewish anti-Zionist rhetoric prior to the Holocaust—began to regain its previous legitimacy. Thus, Israel's most influential philosopher that was , Yeshayahu Leibowitz of the Hebrew University, had no difficulty calling the Israeli armed forces "Judeo-Nazis," and declared that Israel would soon be engaging in the "mass expulsion and slaughter of the Arab population" and "setting up concentration camps." Similarly, Jacob Talmon of the Hebrew University, Israel's most respected historian, asserted that "there is no longer any aim or achievement that can justify ... twentieth-century battle," arguing that Israeli leaders who justified warfare on the grounds of national interest or historical rights were a throwback to the "Devil's accomplices in the last two generations ... [who] warped the soul of millions and all but exterminated the Jewish people." >>



To: Crimson Ghost who wrote (55)11/19/2008 12:07:25 AM
From: LTK007  Respond to of 290
 
'IAF is ready for Iran's nuclear sites'

Nov. 18, 2008
JPost.com Staff , THE JERUSALEM POST
"We are ready to do whatever is demanded of us" in order to stop Iran from getting a nuclear weapon, IAF commander Maj. -Gen. Ido Nehushtan told German magazine Der Spiegel in an interview published Tuesday.

Nehushtan told the magazine that whether a military strike is eventually decided upon is a political question and not an issue of Israel's military capabilities.

A strike against Iran's nuclear facilities "is a political decision," the IAF commander said, "but if I understand it correctly, all options are on the table… The Air Force is a very robust and flexible force. We are ready to do whatever is demanded of us."

When asked by the paper whether the Israeli military was able to destroy Iran's nuclear facilities, which are spread around the country and partly located underground, Nehushtan said, "Please understand that I do not want to get into details. I can only say this: It is not a technical or logistical question."

Nehushtan said the cutting edge capabilities of the IDF in the region were not only a derivative of the advanced technologies it uses.

"Modern technology is one thing, but the biggest advantage we have is our soldiers and officers. Israel is a small country. We neither have a big population nor natural resources. Our biggest asset is our human resources. And it is the Air Force that makes best use of it," he said.

Nehushtan then addressed the new reality in Lebanon since the integration of Hizbullah into the government in Beirut several months ago.

"Hizbullah has been part of the Lebanese government since this spring. It is not a fringe terror organization - it is supported by the state. Militarily, Hizbullah is stronger than the regular Lebanese army. If they attack us, we might react differently [to how we did in the 2006 Second Lebanon War]," he said.

Asked about deploying missile defense systems to protect Israelis from the Kassam rockets and mortar shells fired from Gaza, as well as the Iranian threat of ballistic missiles, the IAF commander described Israel's huge investments in missile defense as an "insurance policy."

"Each type of rocket requires a different defense system. Up until today, only the Arrow System, is functioning. It can intercept ballistic missiles. In order to defend ourselves against the short-range rockets of Hamas and Hizbullah, we are building the Iron Dome system. In response to the threat of medium-range rockets, we are developing a system called David's Sling. This is all very expensive. It is like an insurance policy: You pay a lot, even if nothing happens. But if something then does happen, then you are satisfied with the investment," he explained.



To: Crimson Ghost who wrote (55)11/19/2008 7:16:53 PM
From: LTK0071 Recommendation  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 290
 
CG, i collect names of Israeli jews that are strongly oppositional to where Israel has been and where it is going, these the jews SHOUTED DOWN by the Fanatic Ultra-Zionist--so when i charge this shouters as Judeo-Nazis, i am talking about a group that captured both the power in Israel and the U.S., and it is this FANATIC group that Obama is EMBRACING, and that is UNACCEPTABLE to me, as a human being.

This name i put forth now is well respected Israeli writer , who was just coming of age in 1948 Israel, his name ,A.B.Yehoshua.
This is from a review of his newest novel, i excerpt the this a passge from the review, the words speak for themselves.
First his photo to give flesh to the name


the title of the review is "No Heroes" the books title "Friendly Fire"

<<When Daniela arrives in Africa, she discovers that her brother-in-law, Yirmiyahu (Hebrew for Jeremiah), has sought to cut himself off entirely from his roots. A former Israeli diplomat (his post was terminated), he tells her he doesn’t know the name of the current prime minister and doesn’t wish to know. When she takes out a box of Hanukkah candles so they can light them together, he throws them in the furnace and says he has no interest in the Jewish calendar. “I’ve simply decided to take a rest here from all of that,” Yirmi tells his sister-in-law. “A rest from what?” she asks, stunned. “From the whole messy stew,” he replies. “Jewish and Israeli.”

As manager of an anthropological dig, Yirmi works closely with a Sudanese woman, an animist whose entire family was slaughtered in her country’s civil war and who, despite this, “grew up to be a woman of great tenderness and humanity.” Suffering, even holocaust, Yehoshua implies, aren’t the monopoly of the Jews, and they’re no excuse for cruelty.. Moreover, monotheism isn’t the only honorable explanation for the inexplicable mysteries of the universe.

But it turns out that Yirmi can no more cut himself off from Israel than can Daniela, who never changes her watch to local time and worries about her extended family, no matter what exotic landscape she inhabits. (Has her daughter-in-law remembered that Daniela is away and can’t pick up the grandchildren tomorrow?) For the death that haunts this story isn’t that of her sister, Yirmi’s wife, but of her nephew, his son, six years earlier as a soldier in the Israeli-­occupied West Bank. He was accidently shot by fellow soldiers during an ambush, the victim of what is called in English “friendly fire.” In Hebrew — Eish Yedidutit — these words don’t carry the same meaning, and therefore have a jarring impact on both the ear and the heart. In his rage and desperation, Yirmi seizes on this phrase, translated from English, when he first hears it as “some small spark of light that would help me navigate through the great darkness that awaited me and better identify the true sickness that afflicts all of us.

In search of that sickness, he travels twice to the West Bank Palestinian home where his son lost his life, and his encounters there are the most powerful scenes in the book. Yirmi wants to know exactly how and why his son was killed, and the Palestinians give him the answer he’s seeking. It’s a painful one, offered without sympathy. And while this adds to Yirmi’s misery, he can’t blame them for failing to feel sorry for the occupier and his dead occupier son.

Although Yehoshua is a long-standing critic of the occupation, he doesn’t lionize the Palestinians. There are no heroes here. The land relentlessly eats its own, and “friendly fire” is just one of its ways. After his son’s death, Yirmi pores over the harsh poetic writings of his namesake, the Old Testament prophet, who seems to argue that God is a cruel master promising only further cruelty for the sins of previous generations. There is no escape,............>>