SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : President Barack Obama -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: No Mo Mo who wrote (45277)11/20/2008 2:53:19 PM
From: Lizzie Tudor  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 149317
 
yeah you're right. That 3 million number was all over the news here in the 2002 timeframe but it was Seattle metro area, AND Silicon valley AND boston metro that lost 3 million jobs, or roughtly one million per region which is closer to correct.

The SF bay area has about 7 million people but that does not include the additional millions in the monterrey county area, also considered part of the high tech worker area (the old "play misty" area). So really, you are pulling from a 9-10 million overall population area here, so job losses in excess of one million can be tolerated, but it is difficult, for sure.

In the clinton era the US economy routinely created 300K job/mo or over 3 million jobs per year. So losing 3 million was really just one year of job growth. In this decade we have created only 1/6 of the jobs that we used to in the Clinton era, which is the real problem.



To: No Mo Mo who wrote (45277)11/20/2008 3:01:35 PM
From: ChinuSFO  Respond to of 149317
 
When the companies headquarted in SV announce layoffs, they include employees in offices located worldwide. Besides, there are many SV employees who travel from areas outside of the SV Bay area.

I would just take a drive down SV and see the empty parking lots sometimes wondering if it a holiday or what.