Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Ask Michael Burke -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Skeeter Bug who wrote (117044)	11/23/2008 6:07:40 PM
From: GuinnessGuy	1 Recommendation Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 132070

Skeets, All I think I know I read from what I think are reputable sources. Here's one which might shed some light on things: en.wikipedia.org I really don't think Clinton was a backer of this largely republican effort. He was getting along so badly with them at the time he may have been tempted to veto, but since this was an entire federal budget bill, it would have meant throwing the baby out with the bath water. Note that Senator Gramm sneaked a cute little amendment into the bill that gave Enron the legal means to do that voodoo they did. Wasn't his wife on the board of directors? If so, it's amazing that the fed didn't come after him in the investigation. What a scumbag - along with his wife(scumbagette?). craig