Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: combjelly who wrote (436342)	11/23/2008 12:55:29 PM
From: bentway	1 Recommendation Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1574061

I'd love to see laws set up that banned CEO's from serving on boards, and mandated that a healthy portion of boards be composed of ordinary shareholders and lower level employees.

To: combjelly who wrote (436342)	11/23/2008 4:45:52 PM
From: i-node	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 1574061

They don't have to. The pay is set by the BOD. And the executives sit on each others boards. Not being total dimwits, they realize that if they compensate high, then chances are their own compensation goes up. Totally simplistic. You're taking a complicated subject and trying to address with a single sentence. First, it isn't exactly true; while many people sit on multiple boards, most boards also have people who are either highly invested in the one company, serve it in some advisory capacity, or have other business relationships with the company. For example, it is common for creditors to have a seat on the board, and their interests are obviously adverse to the arrangement you suggest. More significantly, one has to have a very large helping of cynicism to get to this point. Most of the boardmembers, typically, respect the fiduciary interest and act accordingly, to the best of their ability. Finally, these ARE very valuable individuals to a business. Perhaps not worth what they're paid sometimes -- but a guy who runs, for example, GM, is not a dummy, even if he makes mistakes. He is one of a select few who are capable of doing that job. So, substantial compensation is called for. And imposing limitations has to be done carefully so as to not muck up the situation in the process.