Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : The Residential Real Estate Crash Index -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Wyätt Gwyön who wrote (167070)	11/25/2008 1:45:33 PM
From: Dan3	Respond to of 306849

Re: i agree with your idea of taxing fuel. however, it has the drawback of being too rational. in America, you never want to do something rationally if there is a stupider way to sort of accomplish the same thing. Sadly, that's too true. :-(

To: Wyätt Gwyön who wrote (167070)	11/25/2008 1:49:41 PM
From: Pogeu Mahone	Respond to of 306849

I hope you parked in one of those spots. I would every time i see one.

To: Wyätt Gwyön who wrote (167070)	11/25/2008 1:53:07 PM
From: Lizzie Tudor	Respond to of 306849

other day i was at an Office Depot and the whole front row of parking spots (aside from those devoted to the handicapped) was reserved for parking by "Fuel Efficient Vehicles Only". LOL, what a bunch of retards it is just a new form of conspicuous consumption, this time egged on by politically correct mgmt retards throughout the kleptocorporate bureaucracy. This kind of thing goes over very well in CA. We like it. All you have to do is petition your state to remove it, no big deal. Its not like fuel efficient perks are federally mandated, unlike the 100K FEDERAL gas guzzler tax break which was. We only want electric cars here in CA, this market is bigger than the red states and can sustain higher price points. We don't care about the red states, drive as many Yukons as you want.