To: queenleah who wrote (40849 ) 11/25/2008 9:02:34 PM From: octavian 4 Recommendations Respond to of 42834 queen said: I've read and re-read your original statement several times, Kirk. It still says "...the trick of that lying groaner and Dija/Octavian to lie about my record or what I said with this or that fake name then send complaints to management to get me kicked off? There is a tag team effort so one or both may do the lying and have a third party do the complaining. It still makes no grammatic sense, but you're still saying that dija AND gronieel or a mysterious third party send complaints to SI management as part of a tag team effort, and SI management told you so.>> --Queen, he didn't say "or a mysterious third party...," he said that gronieel and I HAVE a third party do the complaining." To me, kirk is saying we either complain directly to SI management, or we instruct someone else to do so. Later, he backpedals and indicates maybe Brinker does it. Surely he doesn't think we "have" brinker do it? -:) << And you're standing by that statement? Maybe if you wrote more clearly and thoughtfully in the first place, you wouldn't trip over your own mouth so much, and then get so caught up in defending what you wrote so untruthfully that you can't get out of your own way.>> --If he (kirk) could think clearly, he would have said that Brinker instructs gronieel and I to lie about him (kirk) and get him (kirk) to post links so that brinker can then complain to SI. -:) That would have made more sense, but it would have been equally untrue. Personally, I don't want anyone banned. I don't think like kirk does. I LIKE to debate with people I disagree with. I have no desire whatsoever to get rid of anyone who disagrees with me.