SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: tejek who wrote (436850)11/26/2008 11:23:33 AM
From: i-node  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 1575399
 
And inode.........you are a bigger fool than Brumar.

Ted

Your arguments just get weaker and weaker. I remember why you're on ignore. I just wish you didn't muck up the thread so I'm constantly having to read your posts to figure out what idiotic statement you've made that led to various threads degenerating.



To: tejek who wrote (436850)11/26/2008 11:46:36 AM
From: Brumar89  Respond to of 1575399
 
You're getting confused about who you're posting to now.

At any rate, you should read the material you post. I have posted some of this material to YOU previously:

Asset securitization began with the creation of private mortgage pools in the 1970s.[68] Securitization accelerated in the mid-1990s. The total amount of mortgage-backed securities issued almost tripled between 1996 and 2007, to $7.3 trillion. The securitized share of subprime mortgages (i.e., those passed to third-party investors via MBS) increased from 54% in 2001, to 75% in 2006.[59] Alan Greenspan has stated that the current global credit crisis cannot be blamed on mortgages being issued to households with poor credit, but rather on the securitization of such mortgages.
......
In 1995, the Community Reinvestment Act (CRA) was revised to allow CRA mortgages to be securitized. In 1997, Bear Sterns was the first to take advantage of this law.[73] Under the CRA guidelines, a mortgage issuer receives credit for originating subprime mortgages, or buying mortgages on a whole loan basis, but not holding subprime mortgages. This rewarded issuers for originating subprime mortgages, then selling them to others who would securitize them. Thus any credit risk in subprime mortgages was passed from the issuer to others, including financial firms and investors around the globe.


Get that? It clashes with your claim that Bush and "deregulation" bears sole responsibility for subprime mortgage problems. In fact, it was a government policy change that allowed subprime mortgage securitization.

Increasing home ownership was a goal of the Clinton and Bush administrations.[83][84][85] There is evidence that the Federal government leaned on the mortgage industry, including Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac (the GSE), to lower lending standards.[86][87][88] Also, the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development's (HUD) mortgage policies fueled the trend towards issuing risky loans.[89][90]

In 1995, the GSE's began receiving government incentive payments for purchasing mortgage backed securities which included loans to low income borrowers. Thus began the involvement of the GSE's with the subprime market.
[91] Subprime mortgage originations rose by 25% per year between 1994 and 2003, resulting in a nearly ten-fold increase in the volume of subprime mortgages in just nine years.[92] The relatively high yields on these securities, in a time of low interest rates, were very attractive to Wall Street, and while Fannie and Freddie generally bought only the least risky subprime mortgages, these purchases encouraged the entire subprime market.[93] In 1996, HUD directed the GSE that at least 42% of the mortgages they purchased should have been issued to borrowers whose household income was below the median in their area. This target was increased to 50% in 2000 and 52% in 2005.[94]


I have no idea why you are posting material that I've posted to you and which undercuts your 'Democrats are blameless, Bush is responsible for all the problems' spin. I can only assume you haven't read the material.