Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : The DD Maven -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: shortsinthesand who wrote (406)	11/29/2008 7:20:51 AM
From: rrufff	3 Recommendations Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 736

Shorts - you say I twist your words. Which words did I twist? In fact, your post is very similar to posts by many longs which you criticize so often. I have no problem with people posting opinions, both positive and negative. I just find it a bit hypocritical that people can be so vehemently critical of others for expressing opinions and then be positive about stocks with just as much risk. Take a deep breath, read your post, and pretend it was written by one of the longs that you so often target. There are elements of excitement. Certainly, the post is positive. Although it says it's not recommending anything, it really is. It says that the stock has bottomed and it gave a price target and said it was a "win,win." It is as enticing to a potential stock buyer as posts that are so often criticized by those that like to be called "bashers." The prospects of a cash dividend, a quarterly one, with an almost unbelievable high yield, and the lead time of several months, the huge potential for issuing shares up to the a/s of 1/2 billion or so, the conflicting words from the company, all these would be welcome and potential for spam attack by the so-called "basher" community. Again, shorts, I welcome your input and often have praised your work on stocks. But, you often spam "has it uplisted yet" and address this as criticism to longs who have posted positively and very similarly to your posts on ANVH. A poster who has posted about uplisting because it was promised should not be personally attacked for that fact, at least no more than a poster who is excited and now positive about a stock that promises a dividend months in advance and has the potential for a huge share issuance in the interim. In any event, here is your post and it clearly looks like you are excited and positive. I don't think I was twisting anything, and certainly much less than many other readers here have had their own posts twisted into claims of being P&D, touts, paid promoters, etc., when all they did was post in a similar fashion. I'll let others judge for themselves. The following is from your post: I know many know I have not been supportive of this company and pointed out the many red flags. This new major material event of paying a quarterly CASH dividend has made me take a second opinion now! I have never seen a pink sheet company do this before and it falls into line with How I invest. Buy companies that pay and increase dividends, dollar cost average and compound the dividends for more growth. This dividend at the current price is an outstanding dividend if they follow through on the next four quarters and pay it. This means I no longer think this stock will fall to the triple zero's or sub penny levels short of any major dilution or rescinding the dividend. As long as they pay the dividend I see this being the bottom as the dividend at .015 is a 25% divy. I see this stock now worth .02-4 cents and the downside risk much smaller now. I am not recomending that people buy the stock but this certainly changes the long term out look ! I am very impressed to see the company issue a CASH dividend.. It's a step in the right direction and win win for the share holders that buy at these prices currently. IF they follow through on this the company will actually be working for the share holders unlike 99.99999% of pink sheet companies that rape the share holders!