Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : Bob Brinker: Market Savant & Radio Host -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Honey_Bee who wrote (40951)	11/29/2008 10:35:40 AM
From: EQ	2 Recommendations Respond to of 42834

ms. honey said: Of course, thanks to the Brinker book-burning-lovers, all of this is not provable because 3500 posts from the Beehives were BURNED! Quatro comments: What an interesting and magnificent scientific anomaly! Burning a huge load of crap actually greatly improves the Air Quality Index. Cheerio! Elan

To: Honey_Bee who wrote (40951)	11/29/2008 7:49:05 PM
From: octavian	5 Recommendations Respond to of 42834

honeybeerose said; <<Octavian, All of these people were free to post on Kirk's Suite101 forums and you know it: "dija, La_la, catbird, joefromspokane, skeptic101, allancoleman, libertypilgrim, snow chief, arcterus, hoopstar and a number of others......" --Your definition of "free to post" is different from mine, honeybeerose. In addition to bbaddict, I also forgot to mention MarkJ. I'm sure there are some others I have forgotten about. <<And don't bother whining about the fact that Dija was asked to leave. I "ain't" going down that road again. He could have apologized and promised to stop attacking the host.>> --Dija didn't do anything to apologize for. Kirk made some accusations, and dija simply asked kirk to substantiate them with evidence. Kirk can only tolerate "yes men" (or "yes women"), that's why you didn't have a problem with him. <<After Skeptic101 gave away the fact that he was posting with multiple aliases, Kirk deleted some of his posts.>> --Skeptic101 was absolutely NOT posting with any other alias. And kirk was deleting EVERY ONE of his posts, which were all very polite. Fortunately, shres, or one of his aliases, caught one of them in the couple of minutes before kirk deleted it, and transferred it to UTEK. There, everyone could see that the post was completely innocent and free of anything resembling a TOS violation. Don't you remember that? << But before Skeptic stupidly gave himself away because he couldn't keep from insulting Kirk, he did a LOT of posting on my Beehive.>> --Skeptic was NOT insulting kirk. He was simply asking questions that kirk didn't want to answer, or even have posted (I imagine he didn't want other posters to see the questions, because then they might wonder why kirk didn't answer them). << I had many debates with him. I tried my best to get Skeptic to stay on topic of Brinker, but nooooo, he just couldn't do it>> --Skeptic DID stay on the topic of Brinker. Anyone who lived through the "bbaddict era" knows what happens to posters who ask kirk tough questions on a board he controls! This whole discussion of ours started because you said kirk did such a wonderful job running the "free discussion" board. It just boggles the mind that you could actually post such nonsense. No one could possibly do a WORSE job running a message board! I think we may actually have a REAL SHILL on this board!