Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : The DD Maven -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: creede who wrote (409)	12/3/2008 8:27:58 AM
From: rrufff	2 Recommendations Respond to of 736

Here's some of the evolution and discovery along the lines of your post. It kinda reminds me of the old adage that "my scam is o.k., but yours is not". From IHub siliconinvestor.com Posted by: sandintheshorts Date: Tuesday, December 02, 2008 11:36:26 AM In reply to: RULiquid who wrote msg# 8335 Post # of 8394 Anviron Holding Company... Dividend now paying 40% outstanding? -Sands REPLY: Posted by: Scovanner Date: Tuesday, December 02, 2008 1:50:36 PM In reply to: sandintheshorts who wrote msg# 8336 Post # of 8394 Paying 40% of what Shorts? The Long Term Debt? The CEO salary which is part of the debt or with the convertible preferred shares that they are dumping. (most likely dumping). Good luck.

To: creede who wrote (409)	12/3/2008 8:34:39 AM
From: rrufff	1 Recommendation Respond to of 736

You know all those spam posts when one of your stocks gets a negative post on a board. A self-styled "cyber sleupp" spams it over and over on the various boards. Posted here to show that it really isn't that useful or tough to be a "sleupp." Bear in mind I spent about 10-15 minutes doing DD and now I can go around and saying I was right 100% of my bashing career. LOL - all tongue in cheek of course. Here's one showing an upset IHub poster Posted by: Killtoy Date: Tuesday, December 02, 2008 8:59:37 PM In reply to: None Post # of 8395 SO BCHP is now ANVH? And they have done this in the past? Lie about finance lie about dividends and meetings etc, etc? How can a company openly lie and steal your money then just change there name and RS of 1000 to 1 and do it all over again with no one even getting in trouble??

To: creede who wrote (409)	12/3/2008 8:38:30 AM
From: rrufff	1 Recommendation Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 736

Might as well spam some more posts by critical upset posters- just to emulate our favorite "cyber sleupps." re ANVH from IHub Posted by: raspoetin Date: Wednesday, December 03, 2008 12:15:33 AM In reply to: None Post # of 8395 read the september and october filings they leave the free tradable float out so since then 55 million issued above the 110 million and probable some conversions taken place i am beginning to think they are selling shares to pay their dividend hahaha ps i have now bought more share at a higher price haha hugo For the Month ended October 31, 2008, there were 110,905,871 shares of common stock issued and outstanding. No rule 144 conversions were completed by the month ending 31 October 2008. For the Month ended September 30, 2008, there were 110,905,871 shares of common stock issued and outstanding. 25,019,508 of these shares were freely tradable. 75,000,000 shares of restricted common stock held by the Avalon Group, Ltd became eligible for rule 144 conversions. No rule 144 conversions were completed by the month ending 30 September 2008. As of

To: creede who wrote (409)	12/3/2008 8:47:13 AM
From: rrufff	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 736

For the record and to his credit, shorts is now posting negatively about ANVH. I mention this to be fair to him. Yes, it's more than what the typical crew of spamming, self-styled "cyber sleupps" do for their "targets," but I believe I've proven my points here. So often, many longs post a favorable opinion, only to find out that a company CEO or other representative has lied or that the long has been wrong for one reason or another. For months or years after stopping posting, or even posting negatively, those same longs are labelled with personal attacks, defamation and even threats by the "crew," those who claim to be "good samaritans." However, we know that the Good Samaritan was indeed "good."