SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : The Residential Real Estate Crash Index -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Travis_Bickle who wrote (168446)12/2/2008 7:23:23 PM
From: MulhollandDriveRead Replies (3) | Respond to of 306849
 
market-ticker.org

And The Fraud Marches On....

Let's start with this delicious little piece of news:

"Dec. 1 (Bloomberg) -- Countrywide Financial Corp., the home lender acquired by Bank of America Corp., was sued by Greenwich Financial Services Fund over claims an agreement to reduce payments on mortgages by $8.4 billion would hurt investors.

The hedge fund claims investors will be harmed by Bank of America’s settlement, reached on behalf of Countrywide, with 15 state attorneys general. The value of trusts that bought 400,000 mortgages will decline under the deal, the fund said."

The gist of the complaint is that the settlement was not going to come out of Countrywide's (now BAC's) hide, but rather was to be effectively offloaded to the investors to whom CFC sold their loans!

That's a cute trick - settle a lawsuit but then force the costs of the settlement off on investors who had no vote in approving the settlement in the first place.

I'll bet this gets legs, and will derail not only this "modification" gambit but anything similar, until and unless the banks involved figure out how to pay down the investors on their own, thereby covering what would otherwise be their losses.

(It should be that way too - the investors didn't make the bad loans; if they're going to take losses it should be through outright defaults, not through forced cramdowns that benefit the banks but screw the bondholders!)

Next, Arnie has declared a "fiscal emergency" in Californicated. No, really?

Here's a hint to you Arnie: shut the hell up. Your time on stage is over dude. You came to power on the claim that you were going to solve these problems and then you turned your back on all of it.

Let's get down to brass tacks - Californicated is screwed because:

1. It has become a sanctuary for illegal immigrants, who do not pay their share of taxes but they do consume services, including police, fire, medical (especially) and education (especially.) The latter two cost the state an insane amount of money which they cannot recover. These liberal programs and policies are the cause of your funding shortfall and until and unless you address them, you've got no chance at solving the problem.
2. Second up is your insane union pay and retirement scales for state employees. Get over yourselves. These are well-publicized and outrageous, and must go.
3. You have an insane amount of energy resource available just offshore. Stop obstructing the development of it.

I applaud you bringing the legislature back into session but I have zero confidence that your state will face its problems and solve them. because there is no will to force all the illegals off the dole and back into Mexico where they came from. Until you do that you can't get the unemployment or cost problems under control - period - and if this pattern continues California will wind up fiscally destroyed.

Save us the crying about the size of your economy. California is absolutely dependent on external energy not due to geography or natural causes but due to intentional obstruction. I'm willing to bend a sympathetic ear when that stupidity ends and not one second before; my solution, were I able to wave a wand, would be to cut off all resource flows from other states (e.g. electrical, oil and water) into your state and see how long LA would sit in the dark before you cried "Uncle!"

You can't tax-and-spend out of this. You must slash costs and produce, and this means getting rid of the dead weight - the illegal immigrants - along with developing energy (especially) within your own borders.

The latter, of course, requires keelhauling the "greenie" contingent - like it or not.

There is one thing Arnie got right:

""We are right now spending money we don't have," Schwarzenegger said. "The federal government shouldn't give us a penny until we straighten out our mess and we can live within our means.""

Exactly.

Now let's shift to the FEDERAL government:

"WASHINGTON - The Bush administration backed off proposed crackdowns on no-money-down, interest-only mortgages years before the economy collapsed, buckling to pressure from some of the same banks that have now failed. It ignored remarkably prescient warnings that foretold the financial meltdown, according to an Associated Press review of regulatory documents."

No really? Let's look at some of the quotes contained in that article:

“Expect fallout, expect foreclosures, expect horror stories,” California mortgage lender Paris Welch wrote to U.S. regulators in January 2006, about one year before the housing implosion cost her a job.

“These mortgages have been considered more safe and sound for portfolio lenders than many fixed rate mortgages,” David Schneider, home loan president of Washington Mutual, told federal regulators in early 2006. Two years later, WaMu became the largest bank failure in U.S. history. (yeah, and in 2007 you were paying dividends out of capitalized interest, which is money you don't actually have in cash form - the event that "set me off" on your hairy butt. Who was right David?)

“It is not our role to be the regulator for the third-party lenders,” wrote Ruthann Melbourne, chief risk officer of IndyMac Bank. (but you bought their fraudulently-written crap - and it killed you!)

“To conclude that ’nontraditional’ equates to higher risk does not appropriately balance risk and compensating factors of these products,” said Lillian Gavin, the bank’s chief credit officer. (That's from Downey, which "boomed" last week. Oops.)

Funny how the truth has a way of intruding on people's pipe dreams.

Oh, one more point.

Remember how the pundits claimed that mortgage delinquency rates over 5% "all in" were lunacy? That it would never happen? Welll....

TransUnion LLC, which analyzed about 27 million consumer records in its database, predicted that the proportion of consumers with mortgages that are 60 days or more past-due will hit 7.17% in the fourth quarter of 2009.

So much for that "it'll never happen" eh? While the culprit in this is clearly the OptionARM mortgages and similar, the point remains that every pundit who has said that delinquencies could "never" go past historical highs - that the market was pricing in something that can't happen - have been repeatedly proved wrong, starting with the WaMu securitization that Mish and I followed months back - and which went to a near-40% delinquency rate within months of being issued.

This ain't over folks - it won't and can't be until the bad debt is forced out into the open and defaulted.

Covering over it with TARPs and other fraudulent machinations simply guarantees we will have an experience similar to that of Japan with 10 years or more of a destroyed and flatlined economy - something that nobody in their right mind wants to see happen.

Those in Washington DC are clearly not in their right mind; more on that to come soon......



To: Travis_Bickle who wrote (168446)12/2/2008 8:07:50 PM
From: DebtBombRespond to of 306849
 
Big Three want more money in bailout
The price tag of a loan to the Detroit automakers could top $34B: GM is asking for up to $18B, Ford wants $9B and Chrysler, $7B.
By Chris Isidore, CNNMoney.com senior writer
Last Updated: December 2, 2008: 6:32 PM ET
NEW YORK (CNNMoney.com) -- Automakers submitted their turnaround plans to Congress Tuesday with the hopes of winning approval for a lucrative loan package they claim is necessary for their survival.

The plans included salary cuts for top executives, the sale of corporate jets by General Motors and Ford and the possible elimination of two GM brands - Pontiac and Saturn. But the Big Three are also now asking the government for as much as $34 billion instead of the $25 billion they originally wanted.

General Motors, the nation's largest automaker, said late Tuesday afternoon that it is seeking up to $12 billion to survive into 2010 and that it anticipates using $4 billion of that just this month in order to avoid bankruptcy.

But GM said it is also requesting an additional $6 billion line of credit to provide more funds should a severe market downturn persist.

Ford (F, Fortune 500) is asking for $9 billion. The company said it hopes that it will not need to use the federal loans though and that it should be able to return to profitability by 2011. But it said it would like to be able to have access to the funds as a backstop.

Chrysler LLC confirmed its previous request for a $7 billion loan that it made at Congressional hearings two weeks ago. So the automakers are asking for at least $28 billion and as much as $34 billion under the three plans.

The plans were submitted on the same day that the auto industry reported the worst U.S. sales in 26 years. Both U.S. and top overseas automakers all reported sales declines of more than 30% from year-ago sales, increasing the level of urgency for the beleaguered Big Three.

Sen. Carl Levin, D-Mich., a strong advocate of the bailout, said he is confident Congress will return next week to approve a loan package. He said he's not concerned about the higher price tag being requested and added that members of Congress wanted an honest accounting of how much might be needed in a worst case scenario.

Speaking at a press conference Tuesday afternoon, House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, D-Calif., also said that it was imperative that the automakers get immediate federal assistance.

"Bankruptcy is not an option. Everyone is disadvantaged by bankruptcy. It takes too long. What takes a year we can do in a few weeks. ... I don't think anyone wants to see bankruptcy," Pelosi said.

But Pelosi wouldn't commit to having Congress return next week to pass a Big Three bailout. She said if Congress does not return, the Treasury Department should use money available under the previous $700 billion Wall Street bailout to tide the automakers over until early next year.

It's not clear if the Treasury Department would do this since the Bush administration has endorsing the idea of aid for the automakers but opposes using the Wall Street bailout money to help them.

What's in the plans
As part of its plan, Ford announced that the salary of Ford CEO Alan Mulally would be cut to $1 a year if Ford (F, Fortune 500) actually borrowed money from the government.

General Motors (GM, Fortune 500) said that CEO Rick Wagoner also will accept a $1 salary. Chrysler LLC CEO Robert Nardelli is already being paid only $1 a year, according to the Chrysler plan.

Mulally had a base salary of $2 million and total compensation of $21.7 million last year, according to the company's filings. Wagoner received base pay of $1.6 million and total compensation of $14.4 million. Closely-held Chrysler does not disclose executive pay.

In an effort to cut costs, GM also suggested that two of its brands - Pontiac and Saturn - could essentially be dropped. GM said it would make Pontiac merely a niche product sold by other dealerships and explore alternatives for Saturn dealers. The company had previously announced it was looking at a possible sale of its Hummer brand.

GM also said it would seek additional changes in the labor contract with the United Auto Workers union to modify retiree health care plans and job guarantees the company cannot afford.

GM said it will cut approximately 21,000 to 31,000 jobs by 2012 to reduce its total workforce to between 65,000 to 75,000 employees. Wagoner said GM reviewed its plan with UAW, which approved the measure. "They know what sacrifices need to be made on both the hourly and salaried side of the ledger," he said.

Officials with the UAW were not immediately available for comment on GM's and Ford's plans. But some local union officials told CNN that national union leaders are planning to hold an emergency meeting in Detroit on Wednesday.

GM said it would also seek to renegotiate its outstanding debt with lenders and bondholders. The company had more than $30 billion in unsecured debt at the end of the third quarter. But GM said it expects to make all of the about $28 billion in payments it owes to suppliers.

"This is part of an urgent request for federal funding to create 'a new GM' - a lean and fully competitive company," said Wagoner in a conference call. "Taking these tough actions will help us weather the current economic stresses, and will position the new GM to be profitable."

Chrysler, which was sold by German automaker Daimler a year ago to the U.S. private equity group Cerberus Capital, said it remains focused on "developing partnerships, strategic alliances or consolidations" as part of its long-term plans.

The company said it believes it could save between $3.5 billion and $9 billion a year from cost savings tied to a merger. In November, GM said that it had halted discussions about a possible combination with Chrysler to focus on its own turnaround efforts.

Chrysler's Nardelli said in a presentation to the company's senior management that he realizes that the $7 billion bridge loan represents a "significant amount of public money." But he added that it is "the least costly alternative considering depth of the economic crisis and the options we face."

More hybrids...no more corporate jets
In its plan, all three automakers also made commitments to speed up the introduction of hybrid and electric vehicles. Ford also pledged to reverse the decades-long trend of losing money on the production of small cars in the United States.

Ford said it would increase the production of smaller vehicles such as the Ford Focus to more than 1 million a year and reduce the complexity of the car's parts in order to reduce costs.

Ford and GM also announced plans to get rid of corporate jets. Mulally, Wagoner and Nardelli were all roundly criticized at a House hearing last month when they admitted they had each flown their corporate jets to Washington to ask for help.

Ford said it will sell its five corporate jets. GM said it plans to sell four of its seven jets and is exploring plans to transfer leases on the other three to another operator. Chrysler spokesman Ed Garsten says Chrysler does not own any private aircraft but instead leases them on an as needed basis.

Mulally and Wagoner will be driving to Washington in hybrid vehicles made by their companies when they return to Capitol Hill later this week to make their case for loans. Nardelli is also driving a hybrid to Washington.

Return to profitability in next few years
Ford said that, as a result of its turnaround plan, it believes its core North American auto operations will be breakeven or profitable in 2011 on a pre-tax basis. The company had previously set a goal of returning those operations to profitability next year but dropped that target in May without giving a new one.

Ford also said it expects industrywide sales of 12.5 million vehicles in 2009, 14.5 million vehicles in 2010 and 15.5 million vehicles in 2011. By way of comparison, U.S. auto sales averaged close to 17 million a year from 1998 through 2006.

But GM and Chrysler submitted plans with far more conservative sales forecasts.

GM said once its restructuring plans are complete, it thinks it can be profitable even if sales only return to between 12.5 and 13 million vehicles a year. In the press call, GM president Fritz Henderson said the company's restructuring plan will make GM fully competitive with Japanese automaker Toyota by 2012.

Chrysler is forecasting a return to profitability with industrywide sales of 13.7 million in 2011 and 2012.
money.cnn.com