SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : Mish's Global Economic Trend Analysis -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: mishedlo who wrote (91105)12/3/2008 12:13:54 AM
From: roguedolphin  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 116555
 
Mob runs riot as Zimbabwe runs out of water
From The Times
December 2, 2008
timesonline.co.uk

New York City riots as city runs out of soylent green
youtube.com



To: mishedlo who wrote (91105)12/3/2008 1:24:28 AM
From: Sr K2 Recommendations  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 116555
 
The media myth: Detroit's $70-an-hour autoworker

by Eric Boehlert

It's been one week since New York Times financial columnist Andrew Ross Sorkin wrote that at General Motors, "the average worker was paid about $70 an hour, including health care and pension costs."

...

Felix Salmon at Portfolio did perhaps the best job explaining the misinformation at play:

The average GM assembly-line worker makes about $28 per hour in wages, and I can assure you that GM is not paying $42 an hour in health insurance and pension plan contributions. Rather, the $70 per hour figure (or $73 an hour, or whatever) is a ridiculous number obtained by adding up GM's total labor, health, and pension costs, and then dividing by the total number of hours worked. In other words, it includes all the healthcare and retirement costs of retired workers. [emphasis in original]

Indeed, according to this Associated Press report, a chunk of GM's $70-an-hour labor costs goes toward paying current retirees' pensions and health-care coverage. In other words, that's money that's not going to end up in the pocket of any autoworker when he cashes his paycheck this week. That's money GM has to set aside in order to pay off costs associated with workers already in retirement. That money has absolutely nothing to do with calculating the hourly wage of a full-time UAW employee today. None.

So, no, UAW workers don't make $70 an hour even if you factor in benefits, because a portion of those benefits are going to people who retired years ago.

...

Message 25222637



To: mishedlo who wrote (91105)12/3/2008 7:15:59 AM
From: ajtj99  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 116555
 
I read Ford's plan, available in PDF format. It's about 36-pages, and its likely scenario assumes US light vehicle sales will bottom next year and increase to about 14.5 million units 2-years later.

Their worst case scenario requires them to get $13-Billion in loans and assumes sales will again bottom next year and increase in 2010-2012.

They are really in denial.