SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: i-node who wrote (437877)12/3/2008 5:44:54 PM
From: combjelly1 Recommendation  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1574637
 
"The date for voting has long since passed."

So?

"Nobody has any way of knowing whether or not those ballots are legitimate."

So you don't know what a chain of custody is either.

"If they have been riding around in someone's trunk since election day, they should be out, regardless of who is favored by it."

Well, duh. They would be out of the chain of custody then.

"There is no reason mystically appearing ballots should be interjected weeks after the election."

If there is a chain of custody, then there is no reason they shouldn't be tallied.



To: i-node who wrote (437877)12/3/2008 7:22:23 PM
From: steve harris  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1574637
 
dems fight to block military ballots from overseas because they are late, but finding ballots weeks later is just fine

they keep trying, they'll eventually steal the election for Franken


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News