SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: i-node who wrote (437893)12/3/2008 7:08:35 PM
From: combjelly2 Recommendations  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 1574464
 
"I have no idea whether similar rules are applicable, or should be, for ballots."

It does. And it is at the heart of Minnesota's procedures. If the chain of custody is broken, or if the seals are broken, the votes aren't valid.

"If, for example, the chain of custody involves several Democrats, there would be nothing whatsoever to keep them from colluding to steal an election."

Or Republicans for that matter. Which is why there are people from both parties and other observers every time a seal is broken or applied. Or the boxes moved.

Instead of just making shit up, why not look into the procedures being used?



To: i-node who wrote (437893)12/3/2008 9:08:52 PM
From: bentway1 Recommendation  Respond to of 1574464
 
You're such an assclown Dave. If it was Coleman trailing by fifty votes, you'd be all for recounting until the end of time!


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News