SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Joe NYC who wrote (437908)12/3/2008 8:03:28 PM
From: TimF  Respond to of 1574685
 
But you have to count vendors, subcontractors, parts suppliers

No you don't. Not when the person your responding to is only counting the direct employees of the company he is trying to impute little importance to

"Eastman Kodak employed 60k"
Message 25173584

Also the vendors etc. work for other companies as well.

Not to mention the fact that if more employees work for them, and they still don't produce a profit, it means even more labor resources are being wasted and even more reason to not bail out the company.



To: Joe NYC who wrote (437908)12/3/2008 10:34:30 PM
From: TimF  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 1574685
 
Also there is a market for cars in the US, and many of them are produced in the US, if Say GM went under (and bankruptcy doesn't mean it would have to go under) a larger number of venders subcontractors, parts suppliers, and even auto assemblers, would be employed by other companies (perhaps Ford, or if they go under as well Toyota, Honda, etc.)