Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : The Obama - Clinton Disaster -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: pompsander who wrote (2729)	12/6/2008 10:09:51 PM
From: DuckTapeSunroof	Respond to of 103300

Ha! But I don't believe that I 'critiqued' anything. <g> (However... the fact that she's polling a strong #2, nearly tied with poll-leading Huckabee, in Republican voter's choices for 2012, probably means that she - and he - will continue to receive a lot of Press attention over the intervening years.) And, likely the proto-2012 candidates welcome the attention! :-)

To: pompsander who wrote (2729)	12/7/2008 2:47:08 AM
From: Patricia Trinchero	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 103300

What about money used to make a man look more macho................????????????????? Didn't Obama people try to make him appear a sportsman? Basketball player and all? Sarah Palin is good lookin and no one needs to spend money to make her look beautiful.............on the contrary, one needs to make her look more regular-like and put her in conservative business outfits. Her good looks don't help her win votes.............it hinders that process. Her good looks tick lots of women off and men, well, they think of her first as a sex object! She doesn't need to look more beautiful.......she'd been better served if she was born with a level 5 appearance.