Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: tejek who wrote (439121)	12/8/2008 12:26:48 PM
From: jlallen	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1574680

Bush is not a good man. He is a weak man lol When will you pinheads learn that your BDS inspired opinions are not facts....? From all the FACTUAL evidence which is available in the public realm, Bush adopted a position on the GWOT and as stuck with it despite withering criticism from boneheads like yourself......that does not indicate weakness. The Bush Admin has been far from perfect but there is no indication in the FACTUAL record that Bush is weak or not in fact a good person.....to the contrary, the evidence abounds against such conclusions, pinhead fantasies notwithstanding.....

To: tejek who wrote (439121)	12/8/2008 1:29:09 PM
From: i-node	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 1574680

Bush is not a good man. He is a weak man and hired people around him who are afraid to tell him the truth. This statement is totally inconsistent with the facts as we know them. Even those who have been most critical of him, e.g., Bob Woodward, have stated that they believe he is a "good man" in the sense that the term is typically used -- that is, he has a good "heart", he is compassionate, he acts not in his self-interest but in what he believes to be the best interests of the nation. Only the Far Left Lunatics characterize him otherwise. As to his appointments, for the most part, they've been quality individuals with a great deal of experience. A lot of people have disagreed with Rumsfeld's performance, but the bashing of Cheney has been totally without foundation and unwarranted. Rice is probably the best Secretary of State we've had since Jim Baker. And there is absolutely no indication, had you done any reading on the subject, that ANY of his appointees were "yes men". Bottom line, you're bashing Bush but your bashing is not based in fact, rather, it is based in partisanship. Which pretty much everything you've ever said in thousands of posts here has been, as well.