Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : GOPwinger Lies/Distortions/Omissions/Perversions of Truth -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Steve Dietrich who wrote (149521)	12/9/2008 2:37:23 PM
From: longnshort	2 Recommendations Respond to of 173976

Owning slaves used to be a 'right'

To: Steve Dietrich who wrote (149521)	12/9/2008 2:41:08 PM
From: Bill	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 173976

deprive all the State's citizens of liberty without due process of law. 31 states have passed referendums recognizing marriage as an act between a man and a woman. The due process of law has been observed.

To: Steve Dietrich who wrote (149521)	12/9/2008 2:44:49 PM
From: one_less	1 Recommendation Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 173976

The example you gave (racial) agrees with the post I provided so your designation of 'pure BS' is irrational. Interracial partners were restricted by law from cohabitating when not married, they were restricted by laws of society and by the doctrines of faith. They were disadvantaged, discriminated against, and denied opportunity if they tried to circumvent those ordinances. I've not seen that complaint in the gay community. I hear a vague complaint about rights and freedoms but it doesn't pan out in substantial measures. If the best you can do is name call and claim historians will mock me then you obviously have no real argument.