Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : Mish's Global Economic Trend Analysis -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: roguedolphin who wrote (91393)	12/10/2008 3:03:52 AM
From: Chispas	4 Recommendations Respond to of 116555

John Crudele - SO, the president-elect thinks the economy will get worse before it gets better. As refreshing as his candor is, Barack Obama really doesn't understand what he's up against. Put your ear real close to this column. There are some dirty little secrets I'm going to tell you that I don't think anyone in the Obama Administration should hear. Here goes: unless the incoming president quickly gets his act together we are going to be hearing the word "depression" a lot next year and he will - in a very short period of time - be as unpopular as the guy leaving the job. Why is this a secret? Because the folks in Washington just don't seem to deal well with reality. And their ideas? Phew, they just don't live in the real world! Don't get me wrong. I'm certainly not wishing this on us. And I don't even think I'm telling you anything you don't already know. But they don't know it. Last week Federal Reserve Chairman Ben Bernanke, a scholar of the 1930s Big-D, scoffed when a reporter asked him during a news conference if we're headed for horrible economic times. The Fed head pointed out that the unemployment rate reached 25 percent during the Great Depression and the job market only revived because we had to spend a lot of money to fight the Germans. Here's what the Obama White House should - but won't want to - know. Right now, the unemployment rate would be more than twice as bad if you go back to the way this figure used to be calculated. In 1994 the Clinton White House decided that the unemployment rate needed to be modernized. So anyone who had been out of work for at least a year was no longer counted as unemployed - they were just too lazy and discouraged to find work. Those clever Clintons also changed the way the questions were asked, so that more people would drop out of the unemployment statistics. John Williams, an economist who tracks this stuff on his Web site ShadowStats.com, says today's unemployment rate would be 16.5 percent if we went back to the old way of measuring it. As it stands, the government announced last Friday that the jobless number climbed 0.2 percentage points to 6.7 percent in November, when an astounding 533,000 positions were eliminated. And the Labor Department also corrected the previous two months - now admitting that nearly 200,000 additional jobs disappeared right before the election. The broader unemployment number that the Department does produce - called the U-6 - rose to 12.5 percent in November from the previous month's 11.8 percent. This figure includes people who want to work full time but can only find part-time gigs. There's a certain irony in the fact that Obama, the first Democrat to win the White House in eight years, is going to be deceived by employment numbers that were first fudged by the last person in his party. Here are a few things Obama should know and maybe contem plate for a while. The new presi dent thinks re building the na tion's infra- structure is the kind of stimulus the economy needs to start cranking again. But will any of the workers fired last week by, say publisher Houghton Mifflin, DuPont, Viacom, AT&T, Avis and dozens of other white-collar heavy companies, really want to pour cement, dig ditches and engage in the brutal tasks that repairing roads and bridges will create? When Roosevelt created jobs with infrastructure stimulus in the '30s, America was a blue-collar society that employed mostly men. We, white-collar prima donnas, aren't going to benefit from this program, no matter how many billions the government spends. But a lot of illegal workers willing to work hard should do quite well. We'll be getting thank yous soon from the Mexican government, which could benefit more from this than Nafta. - And the American job situation is worse than anyone can imagine. Last Friday's disastrous labor numbers included 30,000 jobs that the government thinks were created by companies too small to count. This is called the Birth/Death calculation. But don't count on these positions really existing. This is a Labor Department trick: Count the numbers in the current month and subtract them later when the shock won't be so great. January is the only month when this birth/death model deducts jobs from the monthly count. So the job figure coming out Feb. 6 - just weeks into the new administration - could be mind bogglingly bad. john.crudele@nypost.com nypost.com

To: roguedolphin who wrote (91393)	12/10/2008 3:23:48 AM
From: Chispas	2 Recommendations Respond to of 116555

From ezey on Zeev's board . December 10, 2008 12:19:18 AM The State of Il. Has its problems The tribune is going bkr. and the Goveror wanted a bribe to allow the sale of the Cubs basebale team and stadium. Feds finally arested the gov. after years of investigation because he got in a rush to sell the US senate seat to the highest bider. this will be the 4th gov to be jailed since 1973. need to jail about a couple hundred of the politicions to make a small dent in the coruption. Then agin that would be like pulling your finger out of a pail of water. It would hardly case a ripple. siliconinvestor.com