Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: d[-_-]b who wrote (439624)	12/11/2008 1:58:08 AM
From: tejek	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 1574377

If this was an issue why weren't they both checked out before they ran? People have been asking the question and for proof for over a year and they finally managed to get to court to try to force the issue. When they began asking he was not yet the winner - Barack Obama should, simply out of respect for the nation he was elected to lead, disclose the sealed vault copy of his birth certificate. You are not answering my question....why are they asking? I have never seen the questioned ask before of a presidental candidate or a president elect. Given the circumstances, if Barack Obama respected this nation, he would prove it by the simplest and easiest of gestures - unless, of course, all this talk about change and hope was just a bunch of bull, and he's just "another politician." Here's the outline: If people respected Obama, they would not be asking the question IMO. 1. Under Hawaiian law, it is possible (both legally and illegally) for a person to have been born out of state, yet have a birth certificate on file in the Department of Health. Hawaii has verified that Obama was born in Hawaii. I see no further reason to discuss the issue until you come up with a good reason.