Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : American Presidential Politics and foreign affairs -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Peter Dierks who wrote (30312)	12/11/2008 1:52:14 PM
From: DuckTapeSunroof	Respond to of 71588

Re: "It would have been better formed as a supposition such as: It is reasonable to assume then that after the SCOTUS have definitively weighs-in on the issue the lawsuits will not be filed." No, not really. Since I regard it as likely that the Supreme Court will not accept any of these cases for formal arguing in it's term --- then I believe that it is also likely that various wingnuts out there will NEVER be of the opinion that the 'Supreme Court has definitively weighed-in' (as you phrased it.) Therefore I believe it is likely that wingnuttery and conspiracy fans will continue to file similar suits in various venues --- (although they will be summarily dismissed ever and anon. :-)