Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : The Environmentalist Thread -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Maurice Winn who wrote (23408)	12/11/2008 2:23:36 PM
From: neolib	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 36917

I've posted this one here before: What you can't provide any data in support of, is your claim that solarcycle 24 is going to be a bust. The facts of the matter are that we don't have ANY reliable methods of predicting what future solar cycles are going to be like. The little published on the matter is all very speculative. Further, it should be quite obvious looking at this graph that there is no good correlation between solar cycles and temp trends. Look at the increasing temps in the period 1910-1940 (with low solar cycles) and decreasing temps in the period 1945-55 when the largest solar cycles came. Then solar cycles fell again, but we got the most warming. Once again, nutty Maurice.