SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : The Residential Real Estate Crash Index -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: XoFruitCake who wrote (170945)12/12/2008 2:44:19 PM
From: Think4YourselfRead Replies (2) | Respond to of 306849
 
Man, I HATE it when I am debating with someone who actually knows an awful lot about what is going on! ;o)

You are right. If things work out as you say the Unions will do very well. I would point out that the negotiations were completed before the elections, so the unions took a big risk. If McCain had won that potential advantage wouldn't exist.



To: XoFruitCake who wrote (170945)12/12/2008 8:18:39 PM
From: tejekRead Replies (1) | Respond to of 306849
 
They are even taking on the responsibility for their pension legacy costs."

Heh heh, sorry John, this one is all for the benefit for the UAW. They get 30-40B from big 3 to manage the healthcare. And the come here is if Obama get the universal health care going, they can pocket some of the money since the cost of healthcare will be much lower. It is head, I don't loss and tail I win big scenario for UAW.


I believe they agreed to the provision in 2007. I don't think Obama was president then.



To: XoFruitCake who wrote (170945)12/13/2008 2:23:03 AM
From: marcherRespond to of 306849
 
uaw has been impotent since the 80s. authority was legally removed.

it's current position is that of scapegoat. tie it and whip it.

management laughs at this focus on union strength. just how naive is us public? -ng-