Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : American Presidential Politics and foreign affairs -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Peter Dierks who wrote (30390)	12/15/2008 6:56:39 PM
From: DuckTapeSunroof	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 71588

Re: "An Afghan supply route through Turkmenistan seems more prudent than through Russia and Uzbekistan." Oh, I donno.... You've still got to get to Central Asia somehow... if everything must be airlifted it drives costs WAY UP. (Being able to drive heavy equipment in from Europe no doubt would have some large advantages.) However, no doubt either or both Central Asian routes would prove out to be MUCH superior to the risks incurred driving through the bad lands of 'ungoverned North West Pakistan. Also, if we are to have any hope of eventual success, it is IMPERATIVE that we not give Pakistan a stranglehold over our military effort. So, seen in that light, one or both new routes become absolutely CRITICAL to the mission.