Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Tenchusatsu who wrote (441101)	12/17/2008 4:31:14 PM
From: combjelly	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1584949

" If said vandalims and threats were committed against Trinity United, for example, neither you nor Ted would be waiting for "conclusive evidence."" Dunno what Trinity United is. There is a difference between "conclusive evidence" and "no evidence at all".

To: Tenchusatsu who wrote (441101)	12/17/2008 4:33:33 PM
From: tejek	Respond to of 1584949

CJ, > I am just objecting to you deciding what happened in the face of zero evidence. I don't think the existence of evidence is going to change anyone's argument. Ted will still think the only ones who have to answer to the crime of extremism should be conservatives. I think its very likely that the burning of Palin's church was done by a disgruntled parishioner. The person seemed to know the church very well and chose to do the dirty deed in broad daylight. That doesn't sound like some liberals looking for revenge. Look at the vandalism and the threats against the Mormon church, for example. If said vandalims and threats were committed against Trinity United, for example, neither you nor Ted would be waiting for "conclusive evidence." Why the hell are you bringing up Trinity United......why is it significant? I have no knowledge of that church.