Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : 2026 TeoTwawKi ... 2032 Darkest Interregnum -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: TobagoJack who wrote (44069)	12/18/2008 5:06:36 PM
From: Cogito Ergo Sum	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 217652

TJ, good chance to see 700$ AU... if so I too will buy with 10 hands... OK maybe 11... B

To: TobagoJack who wrote (44069)	12/18/2008 5:52:09 PM
From: pogohere	Respond to of 217652

" i name this the 'assignat problem'." Yes, and the demise of the assignat was due to British counterfeiting, and in this case, the counterfeiter is destined to be the Fed itself: ". . . English counterfeiting was a major factor in the Assignat's decline, as it had been against our own Continental Currency. We will quote [Dillaye] at length, since the reader will have great difficulty finding information on this elsewhere. 'It is true that adventurers in Belgium and priestly knaves in Switzerland commenced the business of forging the Assignats as early as October 1792 . . . It was found that Belgium was too open and too much in sympathy with revolutionary dogmas; and that Switzerland was too confined in its resources and communications for the . . .vast designs of the nobility and clergy. It is true that the business was kept up and increased there, but the great establishments for the systematized fraud found more scope and greater opportunities for uninterrupted work in London. . . England lent its aid, while its cabinet became the concealed agent for the propagation of the felony and the circulation of the nefarious outrage.' Continuing: 'Seventeen manufacturing establishments were in full operation in London, with a force of four hundred men devoted to the production of false and forged Assignats. The success and extent of the labor may be judged by the quantity and value they represented. In the month of May 1795, it was found that there was in circulation from 12 billion to 15 billion francs of forged Assignats . . . The Assignats in circulation at this time . . . issued by the Revolutionary government were 7.86 billion francs, and not, as Mr. White has stated 45 billion francs . . . The value of the lands dedicated . . . as the basis for their redemption . . . was 15 billion francs . . .(pp.32-33) As part of his proof, Dillaye cites legal proceedings in England where court disputes between those involved in counterfeiting brought the matter into the public record." Stephen Zarlenga's "The Lost Science of Money" (American Monetary Institute Charitable Trust, 2002: www.monetary.org) p. 448, see: Message 25065046 Dillaye's account has never been refuted, but is despised for the the inconvenience it causes Andrew Dixon White's supporters.