SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Sioux Nation -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Rock_nj who wrote (156400)12/18/2008 10:32:10 PM
From: SiouxPal1 Recommendation  Read Replies (3) | Respond to of 362361
 
Franken Senate Victory Projected

huffingtonpost.com

I thiMk we have a Bingo.



To: Rock_nj who wrote (156400)12/21/2008 10:42:15 PM
From: stockman_scott  Respond to of 362361
 
AP study finds $1.6 billion went to bailed-out bank execs
______________________________________________________________

By FRANK BASS and RITA BEAMISH
Associated Press Writers
12/21/08

Banks that are getting taxpayer bailouts awarded their top executives nearly $1.6 billion in salaries, bonuses, and other benefits last year, an Associated Press analysis reveals.

The rewards came even at banks where poor results last year foretold the economic crisis that sent them to Washington for a government rescue. Some trimmed their executive compensation due to lagging bank performance, but still forked over multimillion-dollar executive pay packages.

Benefits included cash bonuses, stock options, personal use of company jets and chauffeurs, home security, country club memberships and professional money management, the AP review of federal securities documents found.

The total amount given to nearly 600 executives would cover bailout costs for many of the 116 banks that have so far accepted tax dollars to boost their bottom lines.

Rep. Barney Frank, chairman of the House Financial Services committee and a long-standing critic of executive largesse, said the bonuses tallied by the AP review amount to a bribe "to get them to do the jobs for which they are well paid in the first place.

"Most of us sign on to do jobs and we do them best we can," said Frank, a Massachusetts Democrat. "We're told that some of the most highly paid people in executive positions are different. They need extra money to be motivated!"

The AP compiled total compensation based on annual reports that the banks file with the Securities and Exchange Commission. The 116 banks have so far received $188 billion in taxpayer help. Among the findings:

-The average paid to each of the banks' top executives was $2.6 million in salary, bonuses and benefits.

-Lloyd Blankfein, president and chief executive officer of Goldman Sachs, took home nearly $54 million in compensation last year. The company's top five executives received a total of $242 million.

This year, Goldman will forgo cash and stock bonuses for its seven top-paid executives. They will work for their base salaries of $600,000, the company said. Facing increasing concern by its own shareholders on executive payments, the company described its pay plan last spring as essential to retain and motivate executives "whose efforts and judgments are vital to our continued success, by setting their compensation at appropriate and competitive levels." Goldman spokesman Ed Canaday declined to comment beyond that written report.

The New York-based company on Dec. 16 reported its first quarterly loss since it went public in 1999. It received $10 billion in taxpayer money on Oct. 28.

-Even where banks cut back on pay, some executives were left with seven- or eight-figure compensation that most people can only dream about. Richard D. Fairbank, the chairman of Capital One Financial Corp., took a $1 million hit in compensation after his company had a disappointing year, but still got $17 million in stock options. The McLean, Va.-based company received $3.56 billion in bailout money on Nov. 14.

-John A. Thain, chief executive officer of Merrill Lynch, topped all corporate bank bosses with $83 million in earnings last year. Thain, a former chief operating officer for Goldman Sachs, took the reins of the company in December 2007, avoiding the blame for a year in which Merrill lost $7.8 billion. Since he began work late in the year, he earned $57,692 in salary, a $15 million signing bonus and an additional $68 million in stock options.

Like Goldman, Merrill got $10 billion from taxpayers on Oct. 28.

The AP review comes amid sharp questions about the banks' commitment to the goals of the Troubled Assets Relief Program (TARP), a law designed to buy bad mortgages and other troubled assets. Last month, the Bush administration changed the program's goals, instructing the Treasury Department to pump tax dollars directly into banks in a bid to prevent wholesale economic collapse.

The program set restrictions on some executive compensation for participating banks, but did not limit salaries and bonuses unless they had the effect of encouraging excessive risk to the institution. Banks were barred from giving golden parachutes to departing executives and deducting some executive pay for tax purposes.

Banks that got bailout funds also paid out millions for home security systems, private chauffeured cars, and club dues. Some banks even paid for financial advisers. Wells Fargo of San Francisco, which took $25 billion in taxpayer bailout money, gave its top executives up to $20,000 each to pay personal financial planners.

At Bank of New York Mellon Corp., chief executive Robert P. Kelly's stipend for financial planning services came to $66,748, on top of his $975,000 salary and $7.5 million bonus. His car and driver cost $178,879. Kelly also received $846,000 in relocation expenses, including help selling his home in Pittsburgh and purchasing one in Manhattan, the company said.

Goldman Sachs' tab for leased cars and drivers ran as high as $233,000 per executive. The firm told its shareholders this year that financial counseling and chauffeurs are important in giving executives more time to focus on their jobs.

JPMorgan Chase chairman James Dimon ran up a $211,182 private jet travel tab last year when his family lived in Chicago and he was commuting to New York. The company got $25 billion in bailout funds.

Banks cite security to justify personal use of company aircraft for some executives. But Rep. Brad Sherman, D-Calif., questioned that rationale, saying executives visit many locations more vulnerable than the nation's security-conscious commercial air terminals.

Sherman, a member of the House Financial Services Committee, said pay excesses undermine development of good bank economic policies and promote an escalating pay spiral among competing financial institutions - something particularly hard to take when banks then ask for rescue money.

He wants them to come before Congress, like the automakers did, and spell out their spending plans for bailout funds.

"The tougher we are on the executives that come to Washington, the fewer will come for a bailout," he said.

---

On the Net:

SEC Filings & Forms: sec.gov

Emergency Economic Stabilization Act: treas.gov

© 2008 The Associated Press.



To: Rock_nj who wrote (156400)12/22/2008 5:09:02 AM
From: stockman_scott  Respond to of 362361
 
Roubini doubtful on depression

laobserved.com



To: Rock_nj who wrote (156400)12/22/2008 8:21:01 AM
From: stockman_scott  Respond to of 362361
 
Hedge Funds Concede Oversight Inevitability in Wake of Madoff

By Bob Ivry, Saijel Kishan and Ian Katz

Dec. 22 (Bloomberg) -- Hedge-fund managers say Bernard Madoff may succeed where Christopher Cox failed: forcing regulation of their $1.5 trillion industry.

The 70-year-old Madoff’s alleged bilking of up to $50 billion begins to uncover a part of the investment industry that has skirted government scrutiny. Though Madoff was registered with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission, the agency Cox heads, fund executives who fed him customers’ money weren’t.

“This is an Enron moment for hedge funds,” said Peter Rup, chief investment officer at New York-based hedge fund Orion Capital Management LLC, with $400 million in assets under management. “Regulation would be welcome, primarily from a trust standpoint.”

Suggestions for rules range from strengthening whistleblower programs to imposing capital requirements similar to those for mutual funds. Such regulation would restore confidence in a market, shriveled by losses and investor withdrawals, according to Rup and others.

Hedge-fund assets may shrink as much as 45 percent in 2008, the industry’s worst year on record, according to Morgan Stanley.

Enron Corp., once the world’s largest energy-trading firm, imploded in 2001 amid allegations of accounting fraud. Less than a year later, Congress passed the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, which set tighter corporate accountability rules for publicly traded companies.

There were calls for greater regulation of hedge funds following the 1998 collapse of Long-Term Capital Management LP, which lost $4 billion in a multination debt default kicked off by Russia. It wasn’t until 2002 that the SEC conducted a study of the industry.

Regulation Killed

No regulation was enacted until three years later, when hedge-fund managers were required to register with the commission. The agency’s rule was thrown out by a federal appeals court in 2006 after Phillip Goldstein, now the founder and principal of Bulldog Investors in Saddle Brook, New Jersey, sued the SEC.

Goldstein, 63, doesn’t think the registration would have made a difference in uncovering the alleged Madoff fraud anyway, he said in a telephone interview Dec. 19. He manages $250 million, he stated in an e-mail.

“I don’t see the connection between Madoff and more regulation,” Goldstein said. “Isn’t fraud already illegal?”

Even so, he now admits the need for certain federal protection.

“There should be a friendlier system to encourage and communicate with whistleblowers,” said Goldstein.

Whistleblower Protection

Harry Markopolos, former chief investment officer at Rampart Investment Management, sent the SEC a report in 2005 outlining suspicions he had about Madoff since 1999, according to an e-mail from the ex-CIO.

Fairfield Greenwich Group, Tremont Group Holdings Inc. and other so-called funds of funds had at least $20.3 billion under management with Madoff.

The investments raise the question whether sufficient due diligence is being done by those considered among the market’s most sophisticated investors, according to Karim Leguel, chief investment officer in New York for London-based Rasini & C. Ltd., which advises clients on investing in hedge funds.

Investment managers, including hedge funds, with more than $100 million in assets are required by the SEC to disclose quarterly their holdings of U.S. stocks. By comparison, mutual funds have to publish their net asset values daily and update their daily returns based on the previous day’s market close.

Conflicts of Interest

“There needs to be greater oversight of the fiduciary roles where there are clear conflicts of interest as in the case of Madoff,” said Mehraj Mattoo, London-based global head of alternative investments for Commerzbank AG. “Investment advisory and custody roles have to be segregated. This is critical to avoid frauds. To reduce investment risks, we need greater disclosure of the magnitude of leverage.”

“It doesn’t matter which agency is entrusted with the job of regulation, so long as it is adequately staffed and has sufficient resources and technical expertise to carry out the job,” he said.

Mary Schapiro, President-elect Barack Obama’s pick to lead the SEC, has said the Federal Reserve should be given broader authority to oversee hedge funds.

“Some firms were using misleading historical-related performance data, substituting current adviser or related fund data for the fund’s actual performance,” she told a National Association of Securities Dealers conference in May 2003.

Inadequate Risk Disclosure

“We found inadequate risk disclosure and touting, such as how the fund can beat the market with less volatility and promises about expected returns,” she said. Schapiro, 53, has served as NASD chairman and president of its enforcement arm.

Not everyone in the industry has opposed regulation. Four hedge-fund managers -- George Soros of Soros Fund Management LLC, John Paulson of Paulson & Co. and Philip Falcone of Harbinger Capital Partners, all of New York, and James Simons of Renaissance Technologies Corp. in East Setauket, New York -- testified before Congress that some form of federal oversight was appropriate.

Investors “have a right to know what assets companies have an interest in -- whether on or off their balance sheets -- and what those assets are really worth,” Falcone, who heads Harbinger Capital, with $20 billion in assets under management, told Congress.

Fund Standards

The holdout against regulation at the Congressional hearing was Kenneth Griffin, whose Chicago-based Citadel Investment Group LLC halted year-end withdrawals from its two biggest funds, which have lost 49.5 percent of their value through Dec. 5, according to a letter to clients. Citadel has $13 billion in assets under management.

Hedge funds should be held to minimum capital standards and borrowing ratios, just like mutual funds, said John Coffee, professor of securities law at Columbia University in New York.

Those requirements are needed because the failure of a major hedge fund, such as Citadel, could be just as destabilizing as the failure of Lehman Brothers Holdings Inc. or American International Group, Coffee said.

“I think that the focus of any legislation will be on protecting financial stability, not consumer protection,” he said.

To contact the reporters on this story: Bob Ivry in New York at bivry@bloomberg.netSaijel Kishan in New York at skishan@bloomberg.netIan Katz in Washington at ikatz2@bloomberg.net.

Last Updated: December 22, 2008 00:01 EST