Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : The Residential Real Estate Crash Index -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: John Chen who wrote (172595)	12/19/2008 12:46:24 PM
From: Bank Holding Company	Respond to of 306849

> 2. drop your health-insurance or just keep catastrophic insurance if you can't get rid of yourself. << LOL!

To: John Chen who wrote (172595)	12/19/2008 12:56:29 PM
From: bentway	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 306849

At FedEx, Kindest Cuts Are Smartest, Too By PETER EAVIS online.wsj.com FedEx mightn't look like the kindest company after announcing wage cuts. But the move could turn out to be one of the smartest corporate responses to the recession -- and may become widely mimicked. If executed well, cuts in wages could even help the economy out of recession, not to mention benefiting the shareholders in the companies that carry out the cuts. In response to terrible shipping trends, FedEx said next year senior execs would have salaries pruned by 7.5% to 10%, while other salaried employees would face a 5% reduction. Hourly workers aren't included in these cuts. From an economic perspective, targeting salaries makes sense at FedEx. Wages and benefits are the largest single operating expense by far -- and are typically equivalent to just over a third of revenue. Why might this approach work? It could help avoid the disruptive and expensive process of firing lots of workers in a trough -- and the added cost of rehiring them when the recovery occurs. FedEx's cuts for its better-paid employees also might give management credibility to ask for cuts elsewhere if the recession drags on. The macroeconomic benefit from cutting wages comes from three sources. First, if it does indeed lead to fewer layoffs, aggregate consumption may take less of a hit. Second, banks could face lower losses from debt defaults. Third, one of the good things about recessions is that they can bring certain prices down to sustainable levels, setting the foundation for an economic bounce back. It makes little sense for wages to be exempt from that adjustment. "The faster you get prices, including the cost of labor, to equilibrate, the faster you can get on with the recovery," says Paul Kasriel, director of economic research at Northern Trust. The risk is that wage cuts stoke labor discontent and lead to production disruptions in a time of economic weakness. The threat of a weak economy mightn't be a deterrent to industrial action. After all, it didn't deter the most recent strikes at Boeing and American Axle.