Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : Mish's Global Economic Trend Analysis -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: koan who wrote (91842)	12/20/2008 7:17:15 PM
From: Sr K	1 Recommendation Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 116555

Of course it's real. I posted that link here Message 25263939 Depending on where you got that link, you know, or could know, it came from Markopolos, the author and source of the input to the SEC, which ignored or buried it. See Markopolos's Documents on online.wsj.com for that one, the SEC's response, and more. That is why Cox should resign. As much as at Treasury, we need the new Administration in place at the SEC. He (Cox) is acting dumbfounded, wants an investigation. As if he never saw Casablanca. Or, maybe, because he did. --- In online.wsj.com there is a Correction & Amplification Harry Markopolos raised concerns with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission about Bernard L. Madoff Investment Securities LLC in 2000. This article incorrectly said he sent a letter to the agency in 1999. and the WSJ coverage goes back to 1992 with online.wsj.com Looking Back A Wall Street Mystery In 1992, two accountants drew an SEC crackdown by promising investors hard-to-believe returns by turning the money over to be managed by an unnamed broker. The mystery broker: Bernard L. Madoff. -- The Wall Street Journal -- Dec. 16, 1992