Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Politics of Energy -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Sam who wrote (3608)	12/21/2008 3:50:21 PM
From: Brumar89	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 86356

And I'll add arguments from claimed concensus don't impress me. Concensus has been wrong before.

To: Sam who wrote (3608)	12/23/2008 8:33:31 AM
From: dvdw©	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 86356

You said "So I am not insensitive to the claim that the scientific establishment can sometimes be drastically wrong." How about this one; All textbooks remain unchanged that oil is derived from decaying fossils....(what a joke) The most egregious myth of our time, used routinely to suit. Science has a bought and paid for element.....science is only as good as its primary systems sensory organs allow, and that friend, is a disgrace. what is the % of bought and paid for operating within the domain of science? if your in most universities, you learn quick......to look in the mirror and see a tenured future or a job on the outside. Better to derive by way of sophistry and adaptation facts that comport with systemic largesse...than buck up and persue science where ever it might lead. like N. Tesla for instance.