Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: combjelly who wrote (441842)	12/21/2008 7:17:37 PM
From: longnshort	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1578002

bad spin, FDR was a loser

To: combjelly who wrote (441842)	12/21/2008 7:21:27 PM
From: longnshort	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1578002

A response to Andrew Wilson's op-ed "Five Myths About the Great Depression." By Donald J. Boudreaux Business & Media Institute 11/4/2008 9:02:11 AM Send this page to a friend! (click here) To the Editor: Andrew Wilson is right: the New Deal did not end the Great Depression ("Five Myths About the Great Depression," November 4). No less an authority than FDR's Treasury secretary and close friend, Henry Morganthau, conceded this fact to Congressional Democrats in May 1939: "We have tried spending money. We are spending more than we have ever spent before and it does not work. And I have just one interest, and if I am wrong ... somebody else can have my job. I want to see this country prosperous. I want to see people get a job. I want to see people get enough to eat. We have never made good on our promises ... I say after eight years of this Administration we have just as much unemployment as when we started ... And an enormous debt to boot!"* Indeed, FDR's market-suffocating policies are almost surely what put the "Great" in "Great Depression." Sincerely, Donald J. Boudreaux * Burton Folsom, Jr., New Deal or Raw Deal? (New York: Simon & Schuster, 2008), p. 2. businessandmedia.org The great fact (as in GREAT Depression) that must be explained is the inordinate length of that severe downturn. Hoover's own policies -- contrary to popular myth -- were interventionist. Roosevelt's policies, reinforced by increasingly anti-private-property rhetoric from him and his advisers during the 1930s, ensured that the depression lasted far longer than it would otherwise have lasted. The facts are clear that unemployment (no matter how measured) remained high for the duration of the 1930s and capital investment abysmally low. As FDR's own Treasury Sec. Morgenthau conceded in 1939, it's difficult to square these facts with claims that FDR's policies worked well. Posted by: Don Boudreaux \| Nov 11, 2008 7:19:20 AM cafehayek.typepad.com