SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : Bob Brinker: Market Savant & Radio Host -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: EQ who wrote (41483)12/21/2008 9:55:58 PM
From: joefromspringfield  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 42834
 
Elan

What did you do that violated TOS? Your post would never have been deleted unless you did. Has Si sent you a warning?



To: EQ who wrote (41483)12/21/2008 10:58:36 PM
From: octavian2 Recommendations  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 42834
 
>> --It seems to me she has already denied it. Why don't YOU rephrase the question the way you think it should be asked? If she doesn't answer you, then I would of course conclude that she DID complain to Dave

EQ responded:

<<Octavian,

No, that specific question (did she report me to SI Dave?) was neither asked nor denied. There is no use for me to ask her a question as CENSORbee will not reply and most likely will report me to SI Dave again.>>

--Whoa!!! Your refusal to ask her a question, even AFTER I said I would believe YOU if she refused to answer, makes me believe she is DEFINITELY telling the truth.

<<Please note that it took several days for her to issue her to issue her weak-bee denial (after discussing her predicament with pig and coming up with a damage control scheme.) She did NOT clarify what she was denying. If Brinker pulled a stunt like that she would be all over him like white on rice.>>

--It wasn't a "weak-bee" denial, it was an absolute, flat-out denial!

I asked YOU if you were assuming, or actually had solid evidence (in so many words) and you DID NOT ANSWER THAT QUESTION.

You know that I have no ax to grind in this dispute. You know that I am not a big fan of honeybee. But I must say the evidence in her favor on this issue is becoming overwhelming!



To: EQ who wrote (41483)12/22/2008 2:51:20 AM
From: Math Junkie1 Recommendation  Read Replies (4) | Respond to of 42834
 
Elan, I think you're wrong in believing that Honey lied when she said she didn't complain to SI. Lying is not her style. Her style is to defend her actions and/or dispute the way they are being described, not deny them altogether.

I think you're overlooking the possibility that one of her pals may have complained on his own initiative.