SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : 2026 TeoTwawKi ... 2032 Darkest Interregnum -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: TobagoJack who wrote (44224)12/22/2008 10:47:57 AM
From: dvdw©  Respond to of 217549
 
Another view
Subject: [Paleolist] New Take on Permian Extinction

>
> dsc.discovery.com



To: TobagoJack who wrote (44224)12/22/2008 1:17:54 PM
From: elmatador  Respond to of 217549
 
Leaders fo the world are praying for a extraneous catastrophe to divert the attention of the populaces.
We had the devil, then the nuclear Armageddom. Now there is nothing to keep populaces in their tip toes and thread the line.

Oh byt the way the International Arctic Research Center, may be running short of cash and need to justify its existence.

Wayo is everywhere TJ!



To: TobagoJack who wrote (44224)12/22/2008 5:12:20 PM
From: pogohere  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 217549
 
Very serious nonsense, this methane biz. According to mainstream science, the earth is supposed to have generated all the energy for all the changes that have taken place throughout its history. Plate tectonics drive continents and creates mountain chains, warm ocean water provides the energy for hurricanes, etc. There is no physics explanation for any of this. Most of what passes for "scientific" explanations are misinformation based on speculation, not science.

Excellent example: comets are said to be dirty snowballs. The actual NASA data indicates that they are black and hot and lack water:

"We know the ice is there," he said. "It's just well-hidden."

"Comet Borrelly is in the inner solar system right now, and it's hot, between 26 and 71 degrees Celsius (80 and 161 degrees Fahrenheit), so any water ice on the surface would change quickly to a gas, " said Dr. Bonnie Buratti, JPL planetary scientist and co-author of the paper. "As the components evaporate, they leave behind a crust, like the crust left behind by dirty snow."

Borrelly is unusually dark for an object in the inner solar system. The comet's surface is about as dark as a blot of photocopy toner, possibly the darkest surface in the solar system. It is more like objects in the outer solar system such as the dark side of Saturn's moon Iapetus and the rings of Uranus."

Let's see: a hot, black snowball with no evidence of ice. Hmmmmmmm

sciencedaily.com

After decades of claiming comets are dirty snowballs, some data emerges that barely supports what was promulgated as definitive:

". . . the first definitive evidence of surface ice on any comet
The area the ice covers is small. The surface area of Tempel 1 is roughly 45 square miles or 1.2 billion square feet. The ice, however, covers roughly 300,000 square feet. And only 6 percent of that area consists of pure water ice. The rest is dust." [emphasis added]

What's that? ~0.25% water?

nasa.gov

Lotta nonsense.



To: TobagoJack who wrote (44224)12/23/2008 6:22:29 AM
From: Haim R. Branisteanu  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 217549
 
Wonder when the last time the write visited Yakutia / Yamalia / Salekhard and surrounding areas - there methane gas is poisoning reindeer/caribou herds a fact known for ages - and this is how Gasprom made its biggest NG discovery