Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : American Presidential Politics and foreign affairs -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: DuckTapeSunroof who wrote (30599)	12/22/2008 7:22:33 PM
From: Peter Dierks	2 Recommendations Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 71588

What is wrong with the Minnesota electoral theft: Start with the George Soros funded Minnesota secretary of State. After being properly bought and paid for ACORN and Soros, as head of the State Canvassing board he is overseeing the theft in slow motion. Newly minted votes 'discovered' in an electoral official's car. Newly minted votes 'discovered' in counties all over the state. 'Mistakenly Rejected' votes being called Franken votes when it is clear they were Coleman votes to anyone except a determined democrat. The biggest crime of all is to count ballots not counted and call it a recount. There are four reasons for rejecting absentee ballots in Minnesota: 1. The voter didn't sign the ballot. 2. The voter was not registered. 3. The voter had already voted. 4. The voter's name, address and signature did not match the information on their absentee ballot application. ACORN's Ritchie advised each county to segregate all non counted ballots into five piles, one for each legal reason for rejection and a fifth to mine for new votes. Some counties followed the law and rejected his 'advice'. The reliably democrat ones by and large followed his 'advice'. It does not take a rocket scientist to understand when the most democrat counties supplied the most rejected votes to mine what the goal and likely outcome would be. All of this is being overseen by Soros and ACORN funded Ritchie. The legal term for this is fraud. Technically because of what process it is being applied to it is called election fraud. Credible election monitors would reject the process. Of course you have stated that you have no problem with this criminal activity and by extension seem to find it mundane and pedestrian. This puts you on a very different side than people of honor.