Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : Bob Brinker: Market Savant & Radio Host -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: EQ who wrote (41505)	12/22/2008 1:29:26 PM
From: joefromspringfield	1 Recommendation Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 42834

Elan whines. "4) Today the scheme took on a new aspect. We learn that the other party is NOW placing the blame directly on a FRIEND for this DASTARDLY DEED (i.e. complaining to SI Dave to have my TOS compliant post deleted!) HEY, WHAT are FRIENDS FOR? If the BLAME YOUR FRIEND scheme doesn’t work out, the other party will probably start blaming Brinker. As I recommended to Octavian, wake up and smell the JAVA. I encourage you to give it some thought. CASE CLOSED" No this case is nowhere near closed. It was Math who suggested that a third party might have done this. Honey responded to Math by telling him he was correct. Honey placed no blame on her friend. As I have said before you can complain to SI all you want but nothing will happen unless the post violates TOS. This site has rules and you violated one of them resulting in your post being deleted. If you want to see where the blame lies look in the mirror. As to who turned you in, it could be that Pig fellow. You attack him just as often as you do Honey. You should ask him about it.

To: EQ who wrote (41505)	12/22/2008 1:58:17 PM
From: Midwest_Investor	3 Recommendations Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 42834

Gang, this is getting boring. Can we get back to discussion of Brinker, those who debate Brinker's advice, Those who call Money-Talk, Brinker's Newsletter(s), Brinker's advice, and those who hang out here to compete with Brinker's products ???? Frankly that's why I'm here. The rest is just noise.

To: EQ who wrote (41505)	12/22/2008 2:33:30 PM
From: Math Junkie	1 Recommendation Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 42834

You're starting to sound just like a basher (i.e., speculation posted as fact).

To: EQ who wrote (41505)	12/22/2008 8:00:25 PM
From: octavian	2 Recommendations Respond to of 42834

EQ said: <<3) The other party waited over a day before even responding. This was because it took that long to exchange emails and devise a cover-up scheme.>> --This is absurd, EQ. Honey don't need no steeeenkin' "cover-up scheme." She has no qualms whatsoever about censoring posters who she thinks "insult" her. And she has no qualms about admitting she did it. <<4) Today the scheme took on a new aspect. We learn that the other party is NOW placing the blame directly on a FRIEND for this DASTARDLY DEED (i.e. complaining to SI Dave to have my TOS compliant post deleted!) HEY, WHAT are FRIENDS FOR?>> --This is absurd too. Obviously, the friend told her (or at least gave her permission) to say what she said.