SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: i-node who wrote (441962)12/22/2008 2:34:51 PM
From: bentway  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 1578342
 
"One thing you and others will never, ever be able to take from Bush -- he stopped us from having another attack after 9/11. "

Here's why that's a fallacy Dave. What if Bush had done NOTHING and we hadn't been attacked? There's just no way to PROVE that anything Bush did protected us.

Sorry, no claim to make there. He might as well claim that he protected us from invasion by space aliens.



To: i-node who wrote (441962)12/22/2008 4:30:28 PM
From: tejek  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1578342
 
Why don't you be honest? You never wanted to do anything about AQ from the outset. Before the war began, you were opposed to taking action against bin Laden. You wanted to let them get away with killing 3,000 Americans.

Link please.



To: i-node who wrote (441962)12/22/2008 7:50:12 PM
From: Alighieri  Respond to of 1578342
 
Why don't you be honest? You never wanted to do anything about AQ from the outset. Before the war began, you were opposed to taking action against bin Laden. You wanted to let them get away with killing 3,000 Americans.

This is crap...it's just not true...I never opposed taking action against OBL, even if that meant going into Afghanistan.

I am quite sure you can't find a single post in which I have said anything but.

Al