Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : The Environmentalist Thread -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: longnshort who wrote (23501)	12/22/2008 4:16:24 PM
From: neolib	Respond to of 36917

Err, yes, since we have been adding CO2 in large amounts, i.e. from about 1850 on, with lots added in the last 50 years or so and more projected going forward. Remember, I have to keep pointing out that in AGW based on GHG, temps lag CO2, so what a shock, we see the CO2 leaping up, but the temps have only been following with a time lag. And yes, there is plenty of wiggle in the temp lines about this trend. The wiggles have frequency content ranging from day length up to decade scale. Nothing unusual there, although plenty of people who should know better use that to delude themselves. Why I have no idea. Must be religion.