To: combjelly who wrote (442220 ) 12/23/2008 4:35:42 PM From: tejek Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1576825 What's crazy is that he's assumed its a liberal that's torched the church and is arguing completely from that POV." Not only that, he has it tied to Prop. 8. I dunno what the ads were like in California, but I don't associate Prop. 8 with Palin, although it would be easy to guess what her stance is. The fact is Prop 8 was a CA event. While gays outside CA were probably aware of it, CA was the state most effected. Of course, Palin played into it by claiming it was her fault. You know that was by intent. She fixed guilt without having to accuse anyone.Now, it might be that it turns out to be some crazed homosexual, totally bereft over the results of Prop. 8. However, the available evidence does not lean that way. Accelerant was pored all around the outside of the building. And it was at night. So the fact there were people inside was likely clear, lights were on. Fire fighters arrived at the scene around 9:40. It has been noted that is extremely early, usually such things happen much later. Reduces the chances of being caught. Granted, in Alaska in November night walks are probably pretty rare, but people driving from point A to point B probably isn't. I think any church that practices any sort of witchcraft has got to have some disgruntled parishioners. It goes with the territory. After all, Wasilla is well known as the crystal meth capital of Alaska. And it isn't just meth, Levi's mother got nailed for oxycontin. Probably distribution by the way it was handled. It is looking like the holy rollers of Wasilla are full of more than just the Holy Spirit... Good point........these are not quite the upstanding citizens Ten is inclined to believe.